History
  • No items yet
midpage
11-30 654
11-30 654
| Board of Vet. App. | Nov 30, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served in USAF (1969–1972); filed for increased rating for service-connected major depressive disorder (MDD) and for TDIU; claims appealed from RO decisions in May 2015 (50% for MDD effective May 27, 2009) and April 2017 (TDIU effective December 5, 2016).
  • Administrative history: Board hearing in April 2013; MDD increased-rating claim remanded in April 2016; veteran declined a second hearing after judge retirement.
  • Medical record: treatment notes and VA exams (2011–2016) documenting depressed mood, chronic sleep impairment, memory problems, reduced motivation, intermittent passive suicidal ideation (no plans/attempts), variable social engagement, and functional limitations related to back pain.
  • Ratings: RO assigned 50% for MDD effective May 27, 2009 and increased to 70% effective December 5, 2016; combined rating was 60% from May 27, 2009–Dec 5, 2016 and 80% thereafter.
  • VA received TDIU applications/21-8940 forms in June 2009 and May 2014; vocational report (July 2015) opined unemployability since 2009; VA examiners and Director of C&P found capability for at least sedentary work prior to Dec 5, 2016.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether MDD rating >50% before Dec 5, 2016 Veteran: symptoms and functional impact warrant higher rating VA: record shows only occupational/social impairment with reduced reliability/productivity consistent with 50% Denied — 50% retained prior to Dec 5, 2016
Whether MDD rating >70% from Dec 5, 2016 Veteran: December 2016 symptoms warrant 100% or >70% VA: symptoms approximate deficiencies in most areas (70%) but not total occupational/social impairment (100%) Denied — 70% retained from Dec 5, 2016
Whether effective date for TDIU should be earlier than Dec 5, 2016 Veteran: unemployable due to service-connected disabilities since retirement in 2009; vocational expert supports 2009 onset VA: threshold schedular criteria for TDIU not met before Dec 5, 2016; medical evidence supports ability for sedentary work pre-Dec 5, 2016 Denied — effective date remains Dec 5, 2016
Whether extraschedular TDIU warranted prior to Dec 5, 2016 Veteran: severity of combined impairments justifies extraschedular TDIU VA Director & Board: record does not show impairment so severe as to preclude substantially gainful employment prior to Dec 5, 2016 Denied — extraschedular TDIU not warranted prior to Dec 5, 2016

Key Cases Cited

  • Vazquez-Claudio v. Shinseki, 713 F.3d 112 (Fed. Cir.) (clarifies that ratings require specific symptoms of corresponding severity and that enumerated symptom lists are illustrative)
  • Mauerhan v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 436 (Vet. App.) (discusses application of mental disorder rating criteria examples)
  • Sellers v. Principi, 372 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir.) (treatment of illustrative symptom lists in ratings)
  • Carpenter v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 240 (Vet. App.) (on use of GAF in VA adjudication)
  • Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir.) (competency of lay testimony)
  • Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498 (Vet. App.) (duties to assess credibility and weigh evidence)
  • Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 36 (Vet. App.) (evaluation of medical evidence and probative value)
  • Hurd v. West, 13 Vet. App. 449 (Vet. App.) (TDIU treated as an increased-rating claim for effective date rules)
  • Dalton v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 23 (Vet. App.) (TDIU is an increased compensation award for effective date purposes)
  • Wood v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 367 (Vet. App.) (procedural principles for effective dates)
  • Gaston v. Shinseki, 605 F.3d 979 (Fed. Cir.) (one-year ascertainable-date rule for increased ratings)
  • Van Hoose v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 361 (Vet. App.) (focus on ability to perform acts of employment, not on finding a job)
  • Wages v. McDonald, 27 Vet. App. 233 (Vet. App.) (Board’s authority to review extraschedular TDIU referrals)
  • Kuppamala v. McDonald, 27 Vet. App. 447 (Vet. App.) (Board review of extraschedular ratings)
  • Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (Vet. App.) (benefit-of-the-doubt rule standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 11-30 654
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Nov 30, 2017
Docket Number: 11-30 654
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.