Randy Jackson v. John Hochberg
669 F. App'x 274
| 5th Cir. | 2016Background
- Plaintiff Randy Dale Jackson, a Mississippi prisoner, sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging excessive force and denial of medical care after being forced face-down and tightly handcuffed during a prison gym riot.
- The incident occurred amid gang unrest in the gym; at least one inmate was stabbed and officers used riot guns and chemical agents to restore order.
- Jackson alleged abrasions, bruises, and pain from the tight handcuffs and claimed medical staff denied treatment.
- The district court dismissed the complaint as frivolous for failure to state Eighth Amendment claims; Jackson appealed.
- The Fifth Circuit reviewed de novo and considered whether the facts, taken as true, could support claims of excessive force, deliberate indifference to medical needs, or judicial bias.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excessive force | Jackson: handcuffing face-down on dirty floor and overly tight cuffs inflicted harm and was excessive. | Officers: force was used to restore order amid a violent riot and was not malicious. | Dismissed — force was applied in good-faith to restore discipline, not maliciously. |
| Denial of medical care | Jackson: medical staff refused treatment for abrasions and bruises from handcuffs. | Prison: injuries were minor and did not amount to serious medical need. | Dismissed — injuries were minor, no serious medical need or lasting harm shown. |
| Judicial bias | Jackson: magistrate ignored facts and law, showing bias. | Court: adverse rulings alone don’t establish bias; record lacks support for bias. | Dismissed — no evidence of bias. |
| Sanctions / in forma pauperis strikes (28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)) | Jackson: appealed the dismissals. | Court: prior frivolous filings count as strikes; repeated frivolous appeals warrant sanctions. | Appeal dismissed as frivolous; Jackson accrues third strike and is barred from IFP absent imminent danger; warned about future sanctions. |
Key Cases Cited
- Geiger v. Jowers, 404 F.3d 371 (5th Cir.) (standard of de novo review for § 1915 dismissals)
- Brewster v. Dretke, 587 F.3d 764 (5th Cir.) (definition of frivolous)
- Samford v. Dretke, 562 F.3d 674 (5th Cir.) (12(b)(6) standard applied to § 1915 dismissals)
- Harris v. Hegmann, 198 F.3d 153 (5th Cir.) (pleading standard for dismissal)
- Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (1992) (Eighth Amendment excessive force test)
- Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994) (standard for deliberate indifference to inmate safety)
- Wilson v. Seiter, 501 U.S. 294 (1991) (serious medical need requirement)
- Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (1994) (adverse rulings alone insufficient to show judicial bias)
- Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.) (frivolous appeal authority)
- Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir.) (strikes under § 1915(g))
- Coughlan v. Starkey, 852 F.2d 806 (5th Cir.) (sanctions for abusive filings)
