History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Loper
299 Mich. App. 451
| Mich. Ct. App. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant pled guilty to possessing child sexually abusive material and to using a computer to commit a crime.
  • Disks provided by defendant’s ex-wife contained hundreds of child pornography images.
  • Four disks contained images of prepubescent children; majority downloaded around May 2007, likely before that date.
  • Defendant admitted during a 2010 interview to downloading some images; four disks were identified in prior proceedings.
  • District court bound defendant over on one count of possession and one count of using a computer to commit that crime; circuit court accepted plea.
  • Sentencing challenged on OV scoring and vagueness grounds; conviction upheld on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is MCL 750.145c(4) vague as applied here? Prosecution argued statute not vague under as‑applied test. Defendant argued statute vague, leading to improper OV scoring. Not unconstitutionally vague as applied.
Whether OV 12/OV 13 scoring was proper given contemporaneity rules OV 12/OV 13 supported by three+ contemporaneous acts. Arguments about contemporaneity and duplication; potential OV 13 alternative. OV 12 properly scored; OV 13 would not change result.
是否两条法条在 pari materia 下冲突 Argues statutes address same conduct. Statutes address different aspects; not in pari materia. Not in pari materia; two separate offenses punished.
是否违反 Title-Object Clause 题名-目的条款 Cynar principles permit title to cover amended provisions. Language from later amendment still germane to title’s purpose. No Title-Object violation; amendments align with title.

Key Cases Cited

  • People v Wiggins, 289 Mich. App. 126 (2010) (contemporaneous acts and OV scoring guidance)
  • People v Malone, 287 Mich. App. 648 (2010) (as-applied vagueness review; burden on challenger)
  • People v Nichols, 262 Mich. App. 408 (2004) (constitutional vagueness standard; substantial rights)
  • People v Cynar, 252 Mich. App. 82 (2002) (Title-Object Clause framework; multiple-object analysis)
  • People v New, 427 Mich. 482 (1986) (non-waiver of certain constitutional challenges)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Loper
Court Name: Michigan Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 14, 2013
Citation: 299 Mich. App. 451
Docket Number: Docket No. 308026
Court Abbreviation: Mich. Ct. App.