midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
655 B.R. 101
Bankr. W.D. La.
2023
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors Jason and Jennifer Litton filed a Chapter 13 petition on February 28, 2023; their only asset at issue is a 2006 Ford F-150 valued at $5,000 and encumbered by a nonpurchase-money lien.
  • Thirteen months before filing they borrowed $4,621.50 from a credit union, granted a security interest in the truck (nonpurchase-money), and owed $3,750 on the loan at filing.
  • Debtors are above the state median income and used Official Form 122C-2 (means test) to calculate disposable income.
  • On Form 122C-2 Debtors claimed three vehicle-related deductions: (1) actual monthly secured debt payment, (2) IRS standardized Operating Costs, and (3) IRS standardized Ownership Costs; the trustee only challenged the Ownership Costs deduction.
  • The trustee argued Ownership Costs apply only to purchase-money loans or leases (acquisition financing) and that deducting the IRS Ownership amount for a nonpurchase-money (equity) loan improperly reduced payments to unsecured creditors; the court sustained the trustee’s objection and refused confirmation of the plan.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the IRS "Ownership Costs" deduction in the means test is "applicable" when a debtor's vehicle secures a nonpurchase-money (equity/cash) loan Trustee: Ownership Costs reflect average monthly payments for acquisition loans/leases; nonpurchase-money loans are not acquisition financing and thus the Ownership deduction is not applicable Debtors: Form 122C-2 permits claiming the standardized Ownership amount if the debtor makes loan payments; they complied with the official form instructions Court: Ownership Costs apply only to lease or purchase-money loan payments; a nonpurchase-money security interest does not qualify, so the deduction is improper

Key Cases Cited

  • Hamilton v. Lanning, 560 U.S. 505 (2010) (discusses definition and treatment of projected disposable income under the Code)
  • Ransom v. FIA Card Servs., N.A., 562 U.S. 61 (2011) (Ownership Costs correspond to car loan or lease payments only; deduction only if debtor will incur that kind of expense)
  • In re Beaty, 306 F.3d 914 (9th Cir. 2002) (bankruptcy forms and rules cannot alter substantive Code provisions)
  • In re Traylor, 595 B.R. 419 (Bankr. D. Utah 2019) (holds nonpurchase-money loans are not an applicable Ownership deduction)
  • Feagan v. Townson, 572 B.R. 785 (N.D. Ga. 2016) (payments on nonpurchase-money security interests do not fall within Ownership Costs)
  • In re King, 497 B.R. 161 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2013) (Ownership expense tied to acquisition financing, not all automobile-secured loans)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Jason N. Litton and Jennifer H. Litton
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana
Date Published: Sep 18, 2023
Citations: 655 B.R. 101; 23-10189
Docket Number: 23-10189
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. W.D. La.
Log In