History
  • No items yet
midpage
07-12 042
07-12 042
| Board of Vet. App. | Feb 2, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served in Army (1970–1972) and Navy (1974–1977); claim arises from genitourinary symptoms treated in service (1971) and post-service diagnoses (prostatitis 2001, BPH 2006, cystitis 2015).
  • STRs show dysuria, suprapubic pain, bacteriuria, referral to urology, and a service impression of chronic cystitis; multiple urinalyses in service records.
  • Post-service VA and private records document recurrent urinary symptoms, diagnoses of prostatitis and benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), prescriptions (terazosin/tamsulosin), and a 2015 private record diagnosing cystitis.
  • Multiple VA DBQ opinions (2012, 2015 addendum, 2016) concluded BPH/not related to service; examiners relied on absence of chronic cystitis in contemporaneous findings and age-related BPH pathology.
  • Board discounted those opinions for failing to consider the 2015 private cystitis diagnosis and other medical evidence; Veteran’s credible lay testimony (and his training as a practical nurse) describing continuity of symptoms was given probative weight.
  • Board granted service connection for a genitourinary disorder (chronic cystitis and chronic prostatitis). Claims about earlier effective date and higher evaluations for service-connected spine and radiculopathy were remanded to the RO for an SOC.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Service connection for genitourinary disorder (chronic cystitis/prostatitis) Symptoms began in service; continuity of symptoms to present; service records show cystitis and bacteriuria VA medical examiners: current condition is BPH or not shown to be chronic cystitis/prostatitis and is age-related, not service-connected Granted: service connection for chronic cystitis and chronic prostatitis (reasonable doubt resolved for Veteran)
Whether VA medical opinions were dispositive Veteran argues continuity and that diagnoses are related (cystitis/prostatitis) VA relies on DBQs concluding no etiologic link to service and BPH as separate, age-related condition Board found VA opinions weakened because they did not consider 2015 private cystitis diagnosis; gave greater weight to lay testimony and records
Competence of lay testimony to establish continuity/identity of symptoms Veteran (practical nurse) asserts current bladder pain same as in service VA questions medical linkage without contemporaneous medical nexus opinion Board found Veteran competent to describe symptoms and credible; medical evidence and lay statements in equipoise, so claimant prevails
Effective date / higher evaluations for service‑connected spine and right leg radiculopathy Veteran filed NOD contesting effective date and ratings RO issued grant of service connection with specified effective dates and ratings; matter not yet SOC’d Remanded to AOJ/RO for issuance of SOC; appellate steps to be followed if Veteran timely appeals

Key Cases Cited

  • Wensch v. Principi, 15 Vet. App. 362 (2001) (Board’s duty to assess credibility and weight of evidence)
  • Buchanan v. Nicholson, 451 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (lay evidence cannot be rejected solely because it lacks contemporaneous medical evidence)
  • Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498 (1995) (factors VA may consider in weighing credibility)
  • Reonal v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 458 (1993) (limitations on probative value of medical opinions that do not consider pertinent evidence)
  • Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 36 (1994) (medical opinions must consider records to be probative)
  • Gonzalez v. West, 218 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (Board must review entire record but need not discuss every piece of evidence)
  • Manlincon v. West, 12 Vet. App. 238 (1999) (procedural rules for initiating appeals after RO decisions)
  • Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999) (claimant’s right to submit additional evidence on remand)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 07-12 042
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Feb 2, 2017
Docket Number: 07-12 042
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.