United States v. HoganUnited States v. Hogan
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Quinton DeWitt Hatcher’s second motion for compassionate release pursuant to
As an initial matter, the United States’s motion for extension [Doc. 1305] is GRANTED and the Court accepts the United States’s response as timely filed. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motion will be DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
In December 2017, Defendant pled guilty to three counts: conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of
In March 2026, Defendant filed his second motion for compassionate release, [Doc. 1298], which he subsequently supplemented with a letter to the Court [Doc. 1307]. He has a projected release date of December 25, 2033. See Federal Bureau of Prisons Inmate Locator, https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ (accessed July 14, 2026).
II. DISCUSSION
“[O]nce a court has imposed a sentence, it does not have the authority to change or modify that sentence unless such authority is expressly granted by statute.” United States v. Thompson, 714 F.3d 946, 948 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States v. Curry, 606 F.3d 323, 326 (6th Cir. 2010)). Under the compassionate release statute,
Here, Defendant provides two reasons that he believes compassionate release is warranted. First, he asserts that “[he] is needed to be the primary caregiver of [his] children since the death of
Second, Defendant contends that he is needed to serve as “the primary caregiver of [his] ailing mother.” [Doc. 1298 at 6]. In support of this claim, he provides medical records showing that his mother suffers from congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and other ailments. [Doc. 1299]. He also provides a letter from his mother, stating that she is 61 years old, has “a whole lot of illnesses,” and needs Defendant to “take care of [her].” [Doc. 1293-3 at 12]. A defendant may establish an extraordinary and compelling reason for release when his parent is incapacitated and he is the only available caregiver. U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(3)(C). “Incapacitated” typically means that the parent is “completely disabled,” unable to “carry on any self-care,” or “totally confined to a bed or chair.” United States v. Sharp, No. 3:09-CR-72-TAV-DCP-1, 2025 LX 174881, at *7–8 (E.D. Tenn. June 10, 2025) (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, Defendant shows that his mother is in poor health. And the Court sympathizes with her situation. However, Defendant has not established that his mother is incapacitated. Therefore, Defendant’s desire to serve as her caregiver is not an extraordinary and compelling reason for
III. CONCLUSION
As noted above, the United States’s motion for extension [Doc. 1305] is GRANTED. Because Defendant has not established extraordinary and compelling circumstances warranting a sentence reduction, his motion for compassionate release [Doc. 1298] as supplemented [Doc. 1307] is DENIED.
So ordered.
ENTER:
s/J. RONNIE GREER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE