Russell v. State, 855 So. 2d 722

PER CURIAM.

We affirm based on the authority of Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Montgomery v. State, 821 So.2d 464 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), review granted, 837 So.2d 410 (Fla.2003); and Hill v. State, 805 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed, 817 So.2d 847 (Fla.2002). We certify conflict with Negron v. State, 799 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); State v. Freeman, 775 So.2d 344 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), review denied, 790 So.2d 1108 (Fla.2001); and Batchelor v. State, 729 So.2d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

Case Details

Case Name: Russell v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Oct 8, 2003

Citations: 855 So. 2d 722; 2003 WL 22298995; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15069; No. 3D03-207

Docket Number: No. 3D03-207

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.