State v. FreemanState v. Freeman
In this appeal, the State challenges the trial court‘s ruling that a no contest plea followed by a withhold of adjudication and completed probation is not a “conviction” under
Marcus Freeman was tried by a jury and found guilty of two felonies. At the sentencing hearing, Freeman objected to the scoring of two prior felonies for which he had entered pleas of no contest and adjudication had been withheld. The trial court properly noted that it was required to follow Batchelor and directed that the two prior felonies be excluded from the scoresheet. Although not mentioned in its written order, the trial court orally ruled that it would exclude not only prior cases without adjudication arising from no contest pleas, but also cases arising from guilty pleas. And, the record reflects that the trial court excluded from the scoresheet three prior misdemeanors for which Freeman had entered guilty pleas and adjudication had been withheld.
Affirmed.
BLUE, A.C.J., and SALCINES, J., Concur.