midpage

People v. LouisPeople v. Louis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 27, 2011
Versions:90 A.D.3d 1075
935 N.Y.2d 516

Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily-required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process, since he had not yet completed his originally-imposed sentence of imprisonment at the time he was resentenced (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Dawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]; People v Harris, 86 AD3d 543 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 859 [2011]; People v Guillen, 85 AD3d 1201 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 859 [2011]).

The defendant‘s remaining contentions are without merit.

Rivera, J.P., Florio, Eng, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Louis
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 27, 2011
Citations: 90 A.D.3d 1075; 935 N.Y.2d 516
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In