midpage

People v. DawkinsPeople v. Dawkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Aug 2, 2011
Versions:87 A.D.3d 550
927 N.Y.2d 797

Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Angiolillo, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Dawkins
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Aug 2, 2011
Citations: 87 A.D.3d 550; 927 N.Y.2d 797
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In