Village of Memphis v. Frahm
287 Neb. 427
| Neb. | 2014Background
- Village obtained easement for a water line on church land; underground wires placed partly outside the easement.
- Frahts purchased the property in 2008 and discovered the line outside the easement; easement recorded in 2009.
- Frahs filed an inverse condemnation in 2009 seeking damages; appraisers valued damages at $15,000; they moved for § 76-726(2) attorney fees and costs, county judge awarded $5,322.
- Village appealed to district court; partial summary judgment resolved easement issues; settlement negotiations followed concluding in a settlement with waiver of most claims but preservation of a § 76-720 attorney fee claim.
- Settlement recitals and stipulation stated Frahms preserved § 76-720 attorney fees; district court denied fees; Frahms appealed; Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed denial of fees and waiver arguments.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the release waived attorney fees under § 76-726 | Frahms argue release did not bar § 76-726 fees. | Express reservation of § 76-720 only; release waives other claims. | Waiver upheld; § 76-726 fees waived. |
| Whether § 76-720 applies to inverse condemnation and timing of negotiations | Good faith negotiations required before inverse condemnation filing. | Good faith negotiations occur after appeal; § 76-720 applies to district court appeal. | For inverse condemnation, post-appeal negotiations satisfy § 76-720. |
| Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying § 76-720 fees | District court should award fees given lack of genuine good faith negotiations. | Record shows post-appeal negotiations; no abuse. | No abuse; district court correctly declined fees. |
| Whether the Frahms were entitled to fees under § 76-720 given settlement negotiations | Settlement negotiations post-appeal should not defeat fees. | Negotiations after appeal evidenced good faith; fees not awarded. | Fees denied due to evidence of good faith negotiations post-appeal. |
Key Cases Cited
- Thrower v. Anson, 276 Neb. 102 (2008) (contract principles govern settlement agreements)
- Armstrong v. County of Dixon, 282 Neb. 623 (2011) (settlement terms and attorney fees interpretation)
- Moody’s Inc. v. State, 201 Neb. 271 (1978) (pre-appeal attorney fees; context for § 76-720)
- Pinnacle Enters. v. City of Papillion, 286 Neb. 322 (2013) (statutory construction and fees; appellate context)
- Johnson v. Nebraska Public Power Dist., 187 Neb. 421 (1971) (appeals in condemnation; de novo review context)
- Henderson v. City of Columbus, 285 Neb. 482 (2013) (eminent domain; good faith and negotiations context)
