History
  • No items yet
midpage
455 S.W.3d 640
Tex. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Williamses attended their daughter's high school soccer game at UTA's Maverick Stadium; Sandra opened a chain-and-padlock gate, fell ~5 feet to the track, injuring her arm and rib.
  • They sued UTA alleging the swinging gate was inadequately secured, with a faulty latch and chain/lock, and asserting various maintenance failures and lack of warnings.
  • Steve asserted a derivative loss of consortium claim.
  • UTA moved to dismiss/plead to jurisdiction, arguing the recreational use statute limits liability, and that Sandra failed to show gross negligence or willful/malicious conduct; Steve's claim also challenged.
  • The Williamses argued Sandra wasn't engaging in recreation at injury time and presented evidence of gross negligence; trial court denied the motion, prompting appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Sandra was engaged in recreation under the statute Williamses: Sandra not playing; spectating not recreation UTA: spectating constitutes recreation under statute Recreational use statute does not apply
Whether UTA had knowledge of the dangerous condition (gross negligence) Williamses: evidence shows UTA knew latch broken, used chain/padlock with known failure risk UTA: no gross negligence shown Fact issue as to gross negligence; evidence supports extreme-risk awareness
Whether Steve provided the required notice under 101.101 Steve's claim derivative; Sandra's notice suffices; UTA on notice of Steve through Sandra UTA: Steve failed to provide six-month notice UTA had adequate notice of Steve's claims

Key Cases Cited

  • Shumake v. CMH Homes, Inc., 199 S.W.3d 279 (Tex. 2006) (construction of knowledge under TTCA notice requirements)
  • Simons v. Department of Criminal Justice, 140 S.W.3d 338 (Tex. 2004) (subjective awareness and notice standards under TTCA)
  • City of Bellmead v. Torres, 89 S.W.3d 611 (Tex. 2002) (recreational-use statute scope and governing factors)
  • In re Labatt Food Serv., L.P., 279 S.W.3d 640 (Tex. 2009) (loss-of-consortium analysis and derivative claims)
  • City of Dallas v. Patrick, 347 S.W.3d 452 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011) (principles on recreational-use statute and immunity waiver)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: University of Texas at Arlington v. Sandra Williams and Steve Williams
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 28, 2013
Citations: 455 S.W.3d 640; 2013 WL 1234878; 02-12-00425-CV
Docket Number: 02-12-00425-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Log In
    University of Texas at Arlington v. Sandra Williams and Steve Williams, 455 S.W.3d 640