History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Ronald Slovacek
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21010
| 5th Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Fisher, individually and as Odyssey Residential Holdings, appeals a district court denial of restitution for a conspiracy involving Don Hill and Slovacek.
  • Fisher sought $1.89 million in MVRA restitution based on his claimed direct and proximate harms from the conspiracy to Hills’ extortion scheme and related acts.
  • The district court originally awarded Fisher $112,500 for extortion-related harms but later denied restitution stemming from Slovacek’s Count 10 conviction.
  • This court previously denied Fisher’s CVRA mandamus challenges to the restitution rulings against Potashnik and Slovacek, and Fisher sought further review after sentencing.
  • The district court entered a final judgment that did not order restitution, and Fisher appealed directly, which the government moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
  • The court held that nonparties generally cannot appeal criminal judgments and that CVRA does not authorize direct appeals by victims, so it dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
May Fisher appeal restitution denial under the CVRA? Fisher argues MVRA with CVRA rights allows direct appeal. Slovacek argues nonparties lack appeal rights; CVRA mandates mandamus review only. Direct appeal by Fisher is not permitted; dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Does CVRA permit nonparty victims to appeal district court rulings? Fisher contends CVRA authorizes appeals for victims. Court precedents foreclose nonparty appeals; CVRA provides mandamus avenues only. Nonparty victims do not have a right to direct appeals under CVRA.
Does 28 U.S.C. § 1291 authorize such an appeal by a nonparty? § 1291 confers general appellate jurisdiction over final district decisions for all, including nonparties. § 1291 concerns what may be appealed, not who may appeal; nonparties remain barred. Section 1291 does not authorize a direct appeal by a nonparty victim.

Key Cases Cited

  • Marino v. Ortiz, 484 U.S. 301 (1988) (nonparties generally cannot appeal judgments)
  • Bayard v. Lombard, 50 U.S. 530 (1850) (writ of error cannot be brought by strangers to judgment)
  • Payne v. Niles, 61 U.S. 219 (1857) (no one can appeal a judgment unless they were parties)
  • United States ex rel. Boarman, 244 U.S. 397 (1917) (nonparty appeals are a settled subject)
  • McClure v. Ashcroft, 335 F.3d 404 (5th Cir. 2003) (criminal judgments should not be lightly disturbed)
  • United States v. Aguirre-Gonzalez, 597 F.3d 46 (1st Cir. 2010) (distinguishes who may appeal under § 1291)
  • United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308 (10th Cir. 2008) (section 1291 appealability considerations for nonparties)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Ronald Slovacek
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 10, 2012
Citation: 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21010
Docket Number: 11-10444
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.