United States v. Joseph White
748 F.3d 507
3rd Cir.2014Background
- White arrested approximately 20 feet outside his home; dispatch described a potential domestic disturbance with a firearm and possible barricading
- Troopers arrived at a trailer home, observed White and his daughter, and detained them with weapons drawn
- Trooper Hoban conducted a cursory search of the mud room and seized a revolver and a shotgun found just inside the threshold
- Samantha White remained outside; troopers conducted a room-by-room walkthrough and found no other persons but observed gun cases and a burnt marijuana cigarette
- May 4, 2012: authorities obtained a search warrant based in part on the two seized firearms and seized 91 additional firearms during the residence search
- White pled guilty to felon in possession, reserving the right to appeal the suppression ruling; appeal challenges only the suppression order
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Buie prong 1 applies to the arrest outside the home | White authority relies on prong 2 for outside-home arrests; prong 1 should not apply | Government contends prong 1 permits a limited sweep as incident to arrest | Buie prong 1 not applicable; arrest outside the home requires prong 2 analysis |
| Whether the search of the home was permissible under Buie and related exceptions | Search was not justified by prong 1 or 2; no exigent circumstances shown | Government relies on Buie prong 1 or exigent circumstances to justify the sweep | Remand needed to consider prong 2 and exigent-circumstances exceptions; not decided on appeal |
| Whether a remand is appropriate to develop other suppression defenses | Record insufficient to assess prong 2 or exigent circumstances | Lower court record adequate for review on appeal | Remand to district court for further proceedings consistent with Buie and related standards |
Key Cases Cited
- Buie, 494 U.S. 325 (1990) (protective sweep incident to arrest; prongs 1 and 2)
- Sharrar v. Felsing, 128 F.3d 810 (3d Cir. 1997) (outside-the-home arrest sweep analyzed under prong 2)
- Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980) (home entry Fourth Amendment protections)
- Jardines, 133 S. Ct. 1409 (2013) (homeinuco Fourth Amendment line at entrance; search considerations)
- Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001) (bright-line home-entry protection)
- Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 333 (1990) (Buie framework for sweeps; prong distinctions)
- Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) (reasonable suspicion standard)
- Kentucky v. King, 131 S. Ct. 1849 (2011) (exigent circumstances exception to warrant requirement)
- United States v. Coles, 437 F.3d 361 (3d Cir. 2006) (exigent-circumstances and scope considerations)
- United States v. Latz, 162 F. App’x 113 (2005) (non-precedential; distinguishable arrest location)
