History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Joseph White
748 F.3d 507
3rd Cir.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • White arrested approximately 20 feet outside his home; dispatch described a potential domestic disturbance with a firearm and possible barricading
  • Troopers arrived at a trailer home, observed White and his daughter, and detained them with weapons drawn
  • Trooper Hoban conducted a cursory search of the mud room and seized a revolver and a shotgun found just inside the threshold
  • Samantha White remained outside; troopers conducted a room-by-room walkthrough and found no other persons but observed gun cases and a burnt marijuana cigarette
  • May 4, 2012: authorities obtained a search warrant based in part on the two seized firearms and seized 91 additional firearms during the residence search
  • White pled guilty to felon in possession, reserving the right to appeal the suppression ruling; appeal challenges only the suppression order

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Buie prong 1 applies to the arrest outside the home White authority relies on prong 2 for outside-home arrests; prong 1 should not apply Government contends prong 1 permits a limited sweep as incident to arrest Buie prong 1 not applicable; arrest outside the home requires prong 2 analysis
Whether the search of the home was permissible under Buie and related exceptions Search was not justified by prong 1 or 2; no exigent circumstances shown Government relies on Buie prong 1 or exigent circumstances to justify the sweep Remand needed to consider prong 2 and exigent-circumstances exceptions; not decided on appeal
Whether a remand is appropriate to develop other suppression defenses Record insufficient to assess prong 2 or exigent circumstances Lower court record adequate for review on appeal Remand to district court for further proceedings consistent with Buie and related standards

Key Cases Cited

  • Buie, 494 U.S. 325 (1990) (protective sweep incident to arrest; prongs 1 and 2)
  • Sharrar v. Felsing, 128 F.3d 810 (3d Cir. 1997) (outside-the-home arrest sweep analyzed under prong 2)
  • Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980) (home entry Fourth Amendment protections)
  • Jardines, 133 S. Ct. 1409 (2013) (homeinuco Fourth Amendment line at entrance; search considerations)
  • Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001) (bright-line home-entry protection)
  • Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 333 (1990) (Buie framework for sweeps; prong distinctions)
  • Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) (reasonable suspicion standard)
  • Kentucky v. King, 131 S. Ct. 1849 (2011) (exigent circumstances exception to warrant requirement)
  • United States v. Coles, 437 F.3d 361 (3d Cir. 2006) (exigent-circumstances and scope considerations)
  • United States v. Latz, 162 F. App’x 113 (2005) (non-precedential; distinguishable arrest location)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Joseph White
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: Apr 14, 2014
Citation: 748 F.3d 507
Docket Number: 13-2130
Court Abbreviation: 3rd Cir.