History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Harold Dorman
2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11159
| D.C. Cir. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • FBI traced a Dodge Charger linked to an October 22, 2013 jewelry-store robbery to 2317 Chester St. SE, listed in public records as Harold Dorman’s address; agents executed a search warrant at the residence.
  • Search recovered multiple items: a Glock under a first-floor couch; a vial of PCP near a living-room vase; a loaded Ruger and drug paraphernalia in a basement bedroom that contained Dorman’s clothes and papers; and a 15.2 oz. juice bottle full of PCP on the basement laundry-room floor. Empty prescription bottles were found in a basement hallway.
  • Dorman was indicted on: Count 1 (possession with intent to distribute ≥100 g PCP), Count 2 (felon in possession of firearm/ammunition, §922(g)(1)), and Count 3 (possessing a firearm during a drug-trafficking offense, §924(c)).
  • At trial, Dorman’s mother testified the basement bedroom was prepared for and primarily used by Dorman; multiple people had access to the house and used the basement laundry room; Dorman was not present during the search and phoned his mother during its execution saying “I’m sorry.”
  • The jury convicted on all counts. On appeal the D.C. Circuit affirmed the §922(g) conviction (Count 2) based on constructive possession of the gun in Dorman’s bedroom, but reversed Counts 1 and 3 for insufficient evidence of constructive possession of the PCP and remanded for resentencing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Government) Defendant's Argument (Dorman) Held
Constructive possession of PCP (Count 1) PCP and paraphernalia were in the home; Dorman’s bedroom and its proximity plus a gun in his room and his mother’s testimony (and his apology) supported constructive possession. Dorman was not present; PCP was hidden in common areas accessible to many; no direct link (fingerprints/DNA) to him; bedroom use was non-exclusive. Reversed — evidence insufficient to show Dorman knew of and exercised dominion and control over PCP.
Felon-in-possession of firearm (Count 2, §922(g)(1)) Gun found wedged in mattress of basement bedroom identified as Dorman’s room; his personal effects and exclusive sleeping there supported constructive possession. Others had access to the home; Dorman not present at search. Affirmed — sufficient evidence Dorman constructively possessed the gun in his bedroom.
§924(c) (firearm during drug-trafficking) (Count 3) Gun and drugs in same house support finding of firearm possession in furtherance of drug trafficking. Drug possession finding insufficient, so §924(c) cannot stand. Reversed — because Count 1 reversed, insufficient predicate drug-trafficking offense for §924(c).
Search-warrant affidavit and cross-examination limits Affidavit established probable cause tying Charger to Dorman and address; cross-examination restrictions were proper. Affidavit omitted material facts (non-identification by victim, mischaracterized car); limiting cross-exam of mother violated confrontation/due process. No reversible error as to Count 2: probable-cause challenges failed; cross-exam limits, if error, were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt for the firearm conviction.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Alexander, 331 F.3d 116 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (constructive-possession requires knowledge plus dominion and control)
  • United States v. Jenkins, 928 F.2d 1175 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (distinguishes drugs in plain view in common areas from hidden stashes when assessing constructive possession)
  • United States v. Booker, 436 F.3d 238 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (proximity plus a firearm can be a “plus factor” supporting constructive possession)
  • In re Sealed Case, 105 F.3d 1460 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (insufficient proof of dominion and control where defendant was not in position to exercise control)
  • United States v. Dykes, 406 F.3d 717 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (possession in a sole-occupant bedroom can support constructive-possession finding)
  • United States v. Harris, 515 F.3d 1307 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (emphasizes limits on attributing possession for items hidden in shared spaces)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Harold Dorman
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jun 23, 2017
Citation: 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11159
Docket Number: 14-3064
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.