United States v. Anthony Mitchell
2 F.4th 786
| 8th Cir. | 2021Background
- Mitchell served 48 months for unlawful firearm possession and began a 36‑month term of supervised release.
- In Sept. 2019 Mitchell and others entered a blocked Des Moines alley where a fight occurred with Georan Churchill; Churchill recorded a 26‑second video and sustained facial injuries requiring stitches.
- Churchill testified Mitchell grabbed, threw, and kicked him; Mitchell testified he punched Churchill once while responding to an attack and denied kicking him.
- The government moved to revoke Mitchell’s supervised release, alleging Mitchell committed willful injury in violation of Iowa law; the district court found Churchill credible, concluded Mitchell committed the offense, revoked supervised release, and imposed 24 months’ imprisonment.
- Mitchell appealed, arguing insufficient evidence (intent and serious‑injury elements) and that the 24‑month within‑Guidelines sentence was substantively unreasonable.
- The Eighth Circuit affirmed, holding the district court’s factual findings were not clearly erroneous and the sentence was reasonable.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether revocation is supported by proof Mitchell committed a new state crime (willful injury under Iowa law) | Mitchell: acted in self‑defense; government failed to prove intent to cause serious injury | Gov: Churchill credible; video, 911 call, Mitchell's admission, and injuries corroborate intent and conduct | Court: Finding not clearly erroneous; credibility determinations upheld; revocation affirmed |
| Whether 24‑month within‑Guidelines sentence was substantively unreasonable | Mitchell: employment and work history warranted a lower sentence | Gov: district court considered employment but reasonably weighed repeated violations and conduct | Court: Presumption of reasonableness for within‑Guidelines sentence not rebutted; sentence affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- United States v. Boyd, 792 F.3d 916 (revocation decision reviewed for abuse of discretion; factual findings for clear error)
- United States v. Carothers, 337 F.3d 1017 (credibility findings of district court given deference)
- United States v. Hernandez, 281 F.3d 746 (credibility determinations are virtually unreviewable on appeal)
- Jima v. Barr, 942 F.3d 468 (discussing Iowa’s definition of bodily injury)
- State v. McKee, 312 N.W.2d 907 (Iowa: bodily injury includes physical pain or impairment)
- State v. Gordon, 560 N.W.2d 4 (Iowa case on bodily injury definition)
- United States v. Goodale, 738 F.3d 917 (within‑Guidelines sentence presumptively reasonable)
- United States v. Campbell, 986 F.3d 782 (district court’s sentencing discretion in weighing factors)
