Thompson v. State
308 Ga. 854
Ga.2020Background
- Peggy Thompson was found dead on Oct. 29, 2014; autopsy ruled homicide from blunt‑force head injuries and asphyxia; male DNA matching Timmy Thompson was recovered.
- Timmy Thompson was indicted for malice murder, felony murder, and aggravated assault; a jury convicted him of felony murder and sentenced him to life without parole; other counts deadlocked.
- At trial the State introduced testimony from Peggy’s adult daughter, son, and stepdaughter about past beatings and strangulations by Thompson against them and against Peggy.
- The trial court admitted that testimony as OCGA § 24‑4‑404(b) other‑acts evidence (to show intent, absence of accident, corroboration) and gave a limiting instruction to the jury.
- Before trial Thompson sought sequestration of witnesses; the court exempted the three family witnesses under the Crime Victims’ Bill of Rights (OCGA § 17‑17‑9) and they heard each other’s testimony.
- Thompson appealed, arguing (1) improper admission of other‑acts testimony and (2) error in failing to apply sequestration to those witnesses; the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Thompson's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Admissibility of other‑acts testimony under OCGA § 24‑4‑404(b) | Testimony only showed bad character; irrelevant and unduly prejudicial | Evidence was relevant to intent, absence of accident, corroboration; probative value outweighed prejudice; sufficient proof of the acts | Affirmed — testimony admissible under Rule 404(b); three‑part Bradshaw test satisfied |
| Sequestration exception for victim’s family (OCGA § 17‑17‑9) | Family witnesses should have been sequestered to prevent collusion and shaping of testimony | Statute permits victims/immediate family to remain; no showing they were material/necessary or that presence would impair a fair trial | Affirmed — trial court acted within discretion to exempt the witnesses from sequestration |
| Sufficiency of the evidence for felony murder | (No sufficiency challenge by Thompson) | Evidence (injuries, timing, DNA, testimony of prior abuse) supported inference of intent and felony murder | Affirmed — evidence sufficient to sustain felony murder conviction (Jackson standard) |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (standard for sufficiency of the evidence review)
- Bradshaw v. State, 296 Ga. 650 (2015) (three‑part test for admissibility of other‑acts evidence under Rule 404(b))
- Booth v. State, 301 Ga. 678 (2017) (application of 404(b) and relevance of prior domestic acts)
- Smart v. State, 299 Ga. 414 (2016) (prior domestic violence admissible to show motive or intent in spouse homicide)
- Olds v. State, 299 Ga. 65 (2016) (Rule 403 exclusion is extraordinary; caution against excluding probative evidence solely for prejudice)
- Naples v. State, 308 Ga. 43 (2020) (404(b) analysis and permissible purposes)
- Castillo‑Velasquez v. State, 305 Ga. 644 (2019) (prosecutorial need when defendant’s account negates intent)
- Nicely v. State, 291 Ga. 788 (2012) (victim/family exceptions to sequestration discussed)
- Davis v. State, 299 Ga. 180 (2016) (purpose of sequestration rule: prevent collusion and shaping of testimony)
- Moore v. State, 297 Ga. 773 (2015) (trial court’s discretion in sequestration exceptions)
