301 Ga. 776
Ga.2017Background
- Michael Terry pled guilty (Sept. 2013 term) to charges arising from the murder of his wife and was sentenced to life plus 20 years concurrent.
- Terry claims he asked plea counsel to withdraw the guilty plea the same day; plea counsel filed a motion on November 11, 2013 (after the next term began Nov. 4, 2013).
- Trial court denied the motion to withdraw as untimely and therefore beyond the court’s jurisdiction because it was filed outside the term in which the plea was entered.
- New counsel (Howe) was appointed and later filed, then orally withdrew, an amended motion to withdraw the plea; court reiterated lack of jurisdiction and denied relief.
- Terry filed multiple pro se motions for an out-of-time appeal; the trial court ultimately granted an out-of-time appeal from the order denying withdrawal and permitted Terry to proceed pro se on appeal.
- Terry asserted ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and that he was denied appointed counsel for a direct appeal; the Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s rulings.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right to appointed counsel for "first appeal" | Terry says he was denied counsel on his first/direct appeal and did not waive the right | No timely direct appeal or motion to withdraw plea was filed; appointed counsel required only for trial and direct appeal when timely triggered | Denied — no entitlement to appointed counsel; no timely motion/appeal triggered right (claim meritless) |
| Timeliness/jurisdiction for motion to withdraw plea | Terry asserts his motion was effectively timely (filed within a statutory range) so court had jurisdiction | Motion was filed after the term in which plea was entered, rendering it untimely and depriving court of jurisdiction | Denied — motion untimely and court lacked jurisdiction to consider it |
| Ineffective assistance of appellate counsel re: withdrawal motion | Terry contends Howe was ineffective for withdrawing the motion on jurisdictional grounds | Even if counsel’s performance is questioned, Terry was not entitled to appointed counsel for an untimely motion; habeas is the proper remedy | Denied — counsel’s conduct not reversible here; remedy is habeas, and no right to counsel for untimely motion |
| Availability of other relief | Terry implied other statutory bases or remedies to withdraw plea | Court explained the proper avenue is habeas corpus, not an untimely collateral motion in the term-based framework | Affirmed — habeas available; trial court decision stands |
Key Cases Cited
- Pierce v. State, 289 Ga. 893 (holding appointed counsel entitlement is limited and a timely motion to withdraw plea triggers counsel) (2011)
- Brooks v. State, 301 Ga. 748 (recognizing limits on appointed counsel for post-plea motions) (2017)
- Henry v. State, 269 Ga. 851 (untimely motion to withdraw plea filed outside term is jurisdictionally barred) (1998)
- Gibson v. Turpin, 270 Ga. 855 (state must provide counsel for trial and first appeal only) (1999)
- Tyner v. State, 289 Ga. 592 (pro se filings by represented defendants have no legal effect to divest trial court of jurisdiction) (2011)