State v. Wilson
129 Ohio St. 3d 214
| Ohio | 2011Background
- Wilson was tried on three counts: aggravated robbery, felonious assault, and kidnapping, arising from a group robbery and beating.
- Trial court sentenced Wilson to 10, 8, and 7 years respectively, consecutive for a total of 25 years.
- On appeal, Wilson argued allied-offenses merger; court of appeals found kidnapping and felonious assault allied, kidnapping and aggravated robbery allied, but felonious assault and aggravated robbery not allied.
- The appellate court vacated all three sentences and remanded for a new sentencing hearing with the state to elect which allied offense to pursue.
- The state sought discretionary review; the Supreme Court held a new sentencing hearing is required after the state’s selection, not mere acceptance of the election.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope of remand after allied-offenses error | Whitfield permits state election on remand; no de novo hearing required. | Remand limited to accepting the state's election among allied offenses. | New sentencing hearing required after state selects; merge offenses for sentencing. |
| Effect of res judicata on resentencing objections | Res judicata bars nothing relevant to resentencing. | Res judicata precludes raising issues not raised originally. | Res judicata does not bar objections arising at resentencing. |
| Raising proportionality and bias concerns at resentencing | Proportionality and bias issues may be raised during resentencing. | These issues were waived or moot on remand. | Proportionality and judicial-bias challenges may be raised at resentencing. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Whitfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 319 (2010-Ohio-2) (remand for allied-offenses error requires state election and new sentencing hearing)
- State v. Saxon, 109 Ohio St.3d 176 (2006-Ohio-1245) (no federal sentencing-package doctrine; remand for resentencing under allied-offenses error)
- State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St.2d 175 (1967) (doctrine of res judicata in criminal appeals)
- State v. Mathis, 109 Ohio St.3d 54 (2006-Ohio-855) (remand considerations; record can be incorporated; deference to first sentencing)
- State v. Underwood, 124 Ohio St.3d 365 (2010-Ohio-1) (allied-offenses sentencing; res judicata considerations)
- State v. Fischer, 128 Ohio St.3d 92 (2010-Ohio-6238) (scope of appeal from resentencing; new sentencing hearing context)
