History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Weems
949 N.E.2d 1027
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Weems was indicted in January 2010 for domestic violence (R.C. 2919.25(A)) with a predicate on two prior domestic-violence convictions.
  • He waived his right to a jury and proceeded to a bench trial, with stipulated prior DV convictions.
  • Brittany Worthy testified that Weems pushed her against her mouth and into a wall, causing a lip injury, and police photos showed the injury.
  • Officer Melendez testified Worthy initially did not want to talk but later stated Weems had hit and pushed her.
  • The trial court found Weems guilty of a third-degree felony DV and sentenced him to one year in prison with potential postrelease control.
  • The sentencing entry notified postrelease control, but the court failed to advise the defendant at sentencing; the court later imposed a three-year postrelease-control period.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency and weight of DV evidence Weems argues lack of knowledge mens rea evidence. State contends evidence shown knowingly by pushing and resulting injury. Conviction not against weight or sufficiency; knowingly mens rea established
Postrelease control notice and sentence voidness Weems was not properly advised about postrelease consequences at sentencing. State concedes error but argues correctable by re-sentencing; issue moot since completed sentence. Postrelease control portion void; discharge from supervision; no further sentencing where term already served

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Simpkins, 117 Ohio St.3d 420 (2008-Ohio-1197) (postrelease-control issue after completion of sentence; authority to re-sentence restricted)
  • State v. Bloomer, 122 Ohio St.3d 200 (2009-Ohio-2462) (cannot resentence when prisoner has completed term; separation of postrelease-control imposition)
  • State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94 (2007-Ohio-3250) (postrelease-control imposition affects judgment when not properly ordered)
  • State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173 (2009-Ohio-6434) (trial court lacks authority to resentence after release for postrelease-control error)
  • State v. Fischer, 128 Ohio St.3d 92 (2010-Ohio-6238) (postrelease-control as void when not imposed; requires remedy consistent with prior precedents)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Weems
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 17, 2011
Citation: 949 N.E.2d 1027
Docket Number: No. 94951
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.