History
  • No items yet
midpage
246 P.3d 112
Utah Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Talbot distributed methamphetamine; sheriff sought warrant to search Talbot’s person, home, and vehicle; deputy stopped Talbot on patrol and handcuffed him for safety; sheriff instructed deputy to detain then arrest Talbot once probable cause was found; arrest preceded a warrant, after which a search yielded drugs and paraphernalia; magistrate later issued a search warrant with limited additional evidence found; Talbot was charged with distribution and paraphernalia offenses; Talbot moved to suppress the pre-warrant evidence, which the trial court denied; Talbot argued the absence of jury voir dire in the record warranted a new trial, which the court declined to reach due to no Rule 11(h) supplement.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the arrest and search incident were constitutional Talbot (Talbot) argues arrest was unconstitutional due to Sheriff's instructions Talbot contends deputy arrest violated scope of detention Arrest valid if supported by probable cause; search incident lawful under collective knowledge
Whether the jury voir dire must be reviewed due to missing record Talbot asserts voir dire omitted from record Talbot failed to supplement under Rule 11(h) Record not supplemented; issue not reviewed

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Trane, 2002 UT 97 (Utah 2002) (probable cause and exigent circumstances; search incident valid)
  • State v. Chansamone, 2003 UT App 107 (Utah App. 2003) (arrest and search timing; contemporaneous events sufficiency)
  • State v. Bench, 2008 UT App 30 (Utah App. 2008) (standard for reviewing suppression rulings; factual findings reviewable for clear error)
  • State v. Harker, 2010 UT 56 (Utah 2010) (probable cause suffices for a lawful arrest even without statutory authorization)
  • United States v. Chavez, 534 F.3d 1338 (10th Cir. 2008) (horizontal/vertical collective knowledge doctrine; imputing probable cause to arresting officer)
  • State v. Dorsey, 731 P.2d 1085 (Utah 1986) (early fellow officer rule authority for collective knowledge)
  • Prows v. Utah, 2007 UT App 409 (Utah App. 2007) (application of collective knowledge doctrine)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Talbot
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Dec 9, 2010
Citations: 246 P.3d 112; 2010 UT App 352; 2010 Utah App. LEXIS 355; 2010 WL 4997096; 671 Utah Adv. Rep. 12; 20080795-CA
Docket Number: 20080795-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.
Log In