History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Scruggs
209 N.C. App. 725
| N.C. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • UNCG police assisted with a campus traffic checkpoint at AT Greensboro; mutual aid extended jurisdiction into Greensboro for certain situations.
  • Officers observed Scruggs on a moped; he made a jerky stop, showed balance issues, and possibly wore an illegal helmet.
  • Officers activated blue lights and stopped Scruggs; they had probable cause for an illegal turn and reasonable suspicion of impairment.
  • Scruggs admitted drinking, officers noted a moderate odor of alcohol and thick speech; three field sobriety tests were administered.
  • Scruggs was arrested for driving while impaired and transported to a mobile Intoxilyzer; he refused a breath sample.
  • Defendant was indicted for DWI and habitual DWI; at trial, he moved to suppress; the trial court denied the motion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether stop/arrest violated Chapter 15A-974 substantially State contends no substantial violation; stop/arrest constitutional. Scruggs argues stop/arrest violated Chapter 15A-974 as a substantial violation. No substantial violation; evidence not suppressed.
Whether mutual aid authority authorized off-campus arrest State asserts authority under mutual aid provisions to arrest off campus when warranted. Scruggs claims authority did not render stop/arrest lawful under §15A-402 or 15A-402(f). Arrest expressly permitted under mutual aid; no substantial violation.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Styles, 362 N.C. 412 (2008) (stop and arrest standards; constitutional when minimal quasi-technical violations)
  • State v. Mangum, 30 N.C.App. 311 (1976) (technical violations do not automatically require suppression)
  • State v. Harris, 43 N.C.App. 346 (1979) (officer can stop/arrest under limited jurisdiction; not always suppression)
  • State v. Melvin, 53 N.C.App. 421 (1981) (evidence search may be admissible even if arrest unauthorized)
  • In re Pittman, 149 N.C.App. 756 (2002) (standard of review for suppression rulings)
  • State v. Hernandez, 170 N.C.App. 299 (2005) (de novo review for conclusions of law in suppression)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Scruggs
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 1, 2011
Citation: 209 N.C. App. 725
Docket Number: COA10-921
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.