midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
362 P.3d 606
Kan. Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Ochoa-Lara was convicted of two counts of identity theft after a bench trial on stipulated facts.
  • Ochoa-Lara argued IRCA preempts state prosecution for identity theft based on unlawful use of another's Social Security number.
  • District court granted motions to dismiss certain aspects and allowed splitting count 1 into two due to Kansas statute changes.
  • Count 1 covered conduct pre- July 1, 2011 and count 2 post- July 1, 2011; Ochoa-Lara did not argue multiplicity before the district court.
  • Convictions were based on stipulation that Ochoa-Lara used another person's SSN to obtain employment and to complete a W-4.
  • Court held IRCA does not preempt Kansas identity theft prosecutions and that multiplicity issue was not properly preserved.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
IRCA preemption of state identity theft prosecutions Ochoa-Lara argues IRCA preempts state identity theft prosecution State argues IRCA does not preempt Kansas identity theft statutes IRCA does not preempt the state prosecutions
Multiplicity of counts Ochoa-Lara argues counts are multiplicitous State contends counts were proper given statute change Issue not reached; abandoned for lack of preservation

Key Cases Cited

  • Chamber of Commerce of United States v. Whiting, 131 S. Ct. 1968 (U.S. 2011) (IRCA preemption framework; I-9 defense for good-faith compliance)
  • Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. _ (U.S. 2012) (preemption considerations in immigration context (discussed for framework))
  • Reynua, 807 N.W.2d 473 (Minn. App. 2011) (state identification-card-related challenges to IRCA preemption)
  • Williams, 298 Kan. 1075 (Kan. 2014) (Rule 6.02(a)(5) briefing requirements; preservation of issues)
  • Godfrey, 301 Kan. 1041 (Kan. 2015) (preservation exceptions for raising issues on appeal)
  • Altria Grp., Inc. v. Good, 555 U.S. 70 (U.S. 2008) (historic police powers not superseded absent clear intent)
  • Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (U.S. 1996) (statutory preemption framework context)
  • Whiting, 563 U.S. 582 (U.S. 2011) (IRCA provisions; I-9 form limitations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Ochoa-Lara
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date Published: Nov 25, 2015
Citations: 362 P.3d 606; 52 Kan. App. 2d 86; 2015 Kan. App. LEXIS 83; 112322
Docket Number: 112322
Court Abbreviation: Kan. Ct. App.
Log In