History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Lofton
2013 Ohio 1120
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2005, Lofton pled guilty to murder (amended from aggravated murder with burglary merged) and was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison.
  • Lofton later moved to withdraw his guilty plea alleging ineffective assistance; the trial court denied the motion.
  • The initial appeal (Lofton I) was dismissed for failure to comply with orders in 2009.
  • In 2011 Lofton again moved to withdraw his plea; the trial court denied, and Lofton challenged post-release control on remand from Lofton II.
  • Lofton II (2012) remanded for re-sentencing due to a prior improper imposition of post-release control; Lofton subsequently challenged post-release control in the current action.
  • The instant appeal (2012–13) challenges the trial court’s denial of a Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw the guilty plea and related post-release-control issues.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether post-release control was properly imposed. Lofton Lofton Claim overruled; issue previously resolved in Lofton II
Whether the court understated the maximum penalty during the plea. Lofton Lofton Res judicata bars the claim; no merit
Whether trial counsel's effectiveness affected the guilty plea given the post-release control. Lofton Lofton Res judicata bars the claim; no merit

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Xie, 62 Ohio St.3d 521 (1992) (post-sentence withdrawal of guilty plea requires manifest injustice)
  • State v. Smith, 49 Ohio St.2d 261 (1977) (abuse of discretion standard governs Crim.R. 32.1 appeals)
  • State v. Clark, 71 Ohio St.3d 466 (1994) (abuse-of-discretion review; finality of decisions)
  • State v. Moreland, 50 Ohio St.3d 58 (1990) (criteria for manifest injustice and Crim.R. 32.1 relief)
  • State ex rel. Duncan v. Chippewa Twp. Trustees, 73 Ohio St.3d 728 (1995) (standard for writ-like review in quo warranto/mandamus-like scenarios)
  • In re Jane Doe 1, 57 Ohio St.3d 135 (1991) (procedural safeguards in criminal appeals)
  • State v. Lofton, 2012-Ohio-2274 (2012) (post-release control issue previously resolved; remand instructions)
  • State v. Beach, 2012-Ohio-1630 (2012) (res judicata bar on Crim.R. 32.1 challenges not raised on direct appeal)
  • State v. Evans, 2010-Ohio-5838 (2010) (res judicata and waivers in post-plea challenges)
  • State v. Houser, 2003-Ohio-6461 (2003) (plea-hearing transcript and sentencing disclosures standards)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Lofton
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 19, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 1120
Docket Number: 12CA11
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.