State v. Hendrix
2013 Ohio 2430
Ohio Ct. App.2013Background
- The State appeals a suppression ruling in which Hendrix and Scott were granted suppression for a warrantless home entry.
- On Oct 31, 2011, a Suffolk Downs neighbor reported the next-door garage had been open for several days, unusual for that door.
- Officers Hall and Semonin approached 3279 Suffolk Downs, checked exterior visibility, and could not contact residents.
- The officers entered the attached garage via the unlocked man door, entered the home, and discovered a large marijuana grow room; they then exited and sought a warrant.
- Indictments followed for possession, cultivation, trafficking, and tools; Hendrix faced an extra weapon-under-disability count; suppression hearings occurred July 26, 2012.
- The trial court granted suppression on Sept 25, 2012; the State appealed and consolidated Scott’s case with Hendrix’s.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether warrantless entry was justified by exigent circumstances | State: emergency aid exception justified entry without warrant | Hendrix/Scott: no valid exigency supported warrantless entry | State prevailed; suppression reversed and remanded for new hearing |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Mills, 62 Ohio St.3d 357 (1992) (mixed law and fact; de novo legal review)
- State v. Fanning, 1 Ohio St.3d 19 (1982) (trial court credibility findings reviewed for plain error)
- State v. McNamara, 124 Ohio App.3d 706 (1997) (independent legal review of evidence)
- State v. Burnside, 100 Ohio St.3d 152 (2003) (framework for reviewing suppression rulings)
- State v. Hobbs, 133 Ohio St.3d 43 (2012) (Burnside applied to suppression rulings)
- State v. Liscoe, 2011-Ohio-1054 (2011) (focus on factual support for trial court findings)
- State v. Gooden, 2008-Ohio-178 (2008) (emergency aid exception recognized)
- State v. Baker, 2009-Ohio-2340 (2009) (three-prong test for exigent/home-entry cases)
- Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (2006) (minimizeing danger; emergency aid principle)
- State v. Dunn, 131 Ohio St.3d 325 (2012) (emergency necessity and warrantless entry standards)
- State v. Price, 134 Ohio App.3d 464 (1999) (corroborated anonymous tips can justify entry)
