History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Hendrix
2013 Ohio 2430
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • The State appeals a suppression ruling in which Hendrix and Scott were granted suppression for a warrantless home entry.
  • On Oct 31, 2011, a Suffolk Downs neighbor reported the next-door garage had been open for several days, unusual for that door.
  • Officers Hall and Semonin approached 3279 Suffolk Downs, checked exterior visibility, and could not contact residents.
  • The officers entered the attached garage via the unlocked man door, entered the home, and discovered a large marijuana grow room; they then exited and sought a warrant.
  • Indictments followed for possession, cultivation, trafficking, and tools; Hendrix faced an extra weapon-under-disability count; suppression hearings occurred July 26, 2012.
  • The trial court granted suppression on Sept 25, 2012; the State appealed and consolidated Scott’s case with Hendrix’s.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether warrantless entry was justified by exigent circumstances State: emergency aid exception justified entry without warrant Hendrix/Scott: no valid exigency supported warrantless entry State prevailed; suppression reversed and remanded for new hearing

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Mills, 62 Ohio St.3d 357 (1992) (mixed law and fact; de novo legal review)
  • State v. Fanning, 1 Ohio St.3d 19 (1982) (trial court credibility findings reviewed for plain error)
  • State v. McNamara, 124 Ohio App.3d 706 (1997) (independent legal review of evidence)
  • State v. Burnside, 100 Ohio St.3d 152 (2003) (framework for reviewing suppression rulings)
  • State v. Hobbs, 133 Ohio St.3d 43 (2012) (Burnside applied to suppression rulings)
  • State v. Liscoe, 2011-Ohio-1054 (2011) (focus on factual support for trial court findings)
  • State v. Gooden, 2008-Ohio-178 (2008) (emergency aid exception recognized)
  • State v. Baker, 2009-Ohio-2340 (2009) (three-prong test for exigent/home-entry cases)
  • Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (2006) (minimizeing danger; emergency aid principle)
  • State v. Dunn, 131 Ohio St.3d 325 (2012) (emergency necessity and warrantless entry standards)
  • State v. Price, 134 Ohio App.3d 464 (1999) (corroborated anonymous tips can justify entry)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Hendrix
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 12, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 2430
Docket Number: 26648, 26649
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.