State v. Bonneau
2013 Ohio 5021
Ohio Ct. App.2013Background
- Paul Bonneau was indicted on eight counts: three counts of gross sexual imposition and one kidnapping charge related to victim M.S., and four related counts concerning A.F.; jury convicted only on the counts involving M.S.\
- Trial court initially sentenced under post-1996 law, then attempted to resentence under pre-1996 law while appeal was pending; this court previously held that resentencing while appeal was pending was void.\
- On remand the trial court resentenced under the law in effect in 1994, merged the three gross sexual imposition counts into the kidnapping count, and imposed a sentence of 5–25 years for kidnapping.\
- The court also designated Bonneau a sexually oriented offender and ordered registration under Megan’s Law.\
- Bonneau appealed the resentencing, arguing (1) kidnapping was only incidental to the sexual offenses (so it could not be a separate conviction or the basis for merger), and (2) retroactive application of Megan’s Law violated Ohio’s Retroactivity Clause.\
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether kidnapping conviction could support sentencing after merger into allied offenses | State: prosecution may elect which allied offense to sentence on; court properly merged and sentenced on kidnapping | Bonneau: any kidnapping was incidental to gross sexual imposition (Logan), so kidnapping not a separate cognizable offense and cannot be the elected merged offense | Court:affirmed; law-of-the-case bars re-litigation of conviction; state may elect any allied offense for sentencing; kidnapping sentence proper |
| Whether retroactive application of Megan’s Law violated Ohio Constitution (Retroactivity Clause) | State: Megan’s Law is remedial and applicable; prior Ohio precedent permits retroactive application | Bonneau: retroactive registration is punitive and unconstitutional under Section 28, Article II | Court:affirmed; Cook and Ferguson support retroactive application of Megan’s Law as nonpunitive; Williams limited to later S.B.10 changes and did not upend Cook/Ferguson for preexisting Megan’s Law application |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Logan, 60 Ohio St.3d 126 (guidelines for when kidnapping is separate animus vs. incidental to another sexual offense)
- State v. Cook, 83 Ohio St.3d 404 (Megan’s Law retroactive application to pre-enactment offenders is remedial, not unconstitutional)
- State v. Ferguson, 120 Ohio St.3d 7 (amendments to Megan’s Law did not impose punitive burdens; retroactivity upheld)
- State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344 (S.B.10 classifications found unconstitutional as retroactive; did not overturn Cook and Ferguson)
- State v. Whitfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 319 (explaining merger doctrine: conviction requires both verdict and sentence; allied offenses may be tried together but only one punished)
- State v. Brown, 119 Ohio St.3d 447 (state may elect which allied offense to pursue at sentencing)
