462 S.W.3d 482
Tenn.2015Background
- Dispatch reported a possible unwanted/intoxicated person (Mechelle Montgomery) at a residence on Trinity Road; officers were dispatched—Shoap as lead, Reiman as backup.
- Officers located a matching black Ford Mustang with two women in a nearby church parking lot; Reiman parked, did not activate lights, approached, and identified the driver as Montgomery.
- Reiman smelled alcohol, observed watery eyes and slightly slurred speech, and took the driver’s license from Montgomery, stating he would “hang out here for a little bit” while waiting for Shoap to return from the residence.
- Reiman retained the license for approximately 10–15 minutes; when Shoap returned he conducted field sobriety tests, placed Montgomery in his patrol car, and both officers smelled burnt marijuana in/around the vehicle.
- Officers searched the car and found an open alcoholic drink and a hand‑rolled marijuana joint; Montgomery moved to suppress, arguing the detention was unreasonably prolonged.
- The trial court granted suppression; the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. The Tennessee Supreme Court reversed, holding the brief 10–15 minute wait for the lead officer was reasonable.
Issues
| Issue | State's Argument | Montgomery's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Reiman’s retention of the driver’s license and 10–15 minute wait constituted an unlawful seizure or an unreasonably prolonged investigatory detention | Waiting for the lead officer (Shoap) while retaining license was reasonable given the call and proximity; brief wait allowed confirmation and safety | The short detention was unlawfully prolonged because Reiman could have immediately investigated (e.g., perform sobriety tests) instead of holding her for Shoap | Held: The seizure occurred when Reiman retained the license, but the 10–15 minute delay was reasonable and did not unreasonably prolong the stop; suppression reversed |
Key Cases Cited
- Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971) (warrantless searches presumptively unreasonable)
- Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) (Fourth Amendment search/seizure principles)
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (investigatory stop requires reasonable suspicion; scope/duration limits)
- United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675 (1985) (brief detention to await another officer can be reasonable)
- Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983) (vehicle stops pose officer safety risks justifying precautions)
- State v. Odom, 928 S.W.2d 18 (Tenn. 1996) (standard of review for suppression findings)
- State v. Daniel, 12 S.W.3d 420 (Tenn. 2000) (consensual encounter becomes seizure when liberty restrained)
- State v. Simpson, 968 S.W.2d 776 (Tenn. 1998) (detention must be reasonably related in scope/duration)
- State v. Troxell, 78 S.W.3d 866 (Tenn. 2002) (detention becomes unreasonable if time/scope exceed proper parameters)
- State v. Williamson, 368 S.W.3d 468 (Tenn. 2012) (totality of circumstances for reasonable suspicion)
