midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
129 So. 3d 831
La. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • J.D. appeals an Orleans Parish Juvenile Court adjudication of delinquency for assault on a school teacher under La. R.S. 14:38.2.
  • Beardon, a teacher at Lake Area New Tech Early College High School, testified J.D. threatened him by stating, “you ain’t safe, I’ll shoot you.”
  • J.D. was adjudicated delinquent after a June 6, 2013 hearing; the court imposed 180 days suspended disposition and one year of active probation.
  • J.D. argues R.S. 14:38.2 is unconstitutional on its face, that trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging the statute, and that the State failed to prove delinquency beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • The appellate court affirms the delinquency adjudication, finding the statute’s constitutionality not properly preserved, and that, even ignoring that, the evidence supports delinquency under the statute.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Constitutionality of R.S. 14:38.2 overbreadth J.D. challenges broad scope of 14:38.2(A)(2)(b) State says overbreadth not preserved on appeal Waived; not preserved on appeal
Effectiveness of trial counsel on direct appeal Ineffective counsel for not raising constitutionality Record insufficient to rule on merits on direct appeal Not resolved on direct appeal; remanded for post-adjudication relief potential hearing
Applicability of statutory text to utterance Words alone should be enough under 14:38.2(A)(2)(b) Statute’s plain language supports conviction without fear element Guilty under the plain language of the statute

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (U.S. 2010) (overbreadth analysis for constitutional challenges)
  • State v. Overstreet, 111 So.3d 308 (La. 2013) (unconstitutionality must be specially pleaded and particularized)
  • State v. Hatton, 985 So.2d 709 (La. 2008) (requirement to plead unconstitutionality with particular grounds)
  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. 1979) (standards for appellate review of evidence sufficiency)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. J.D.
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Nov 27, 2013
Citations: 129 So. 3d 831; 2013 La. App. LEXIS 2466; 2013 WL 6923713; 2013 La.App. 4 Cir. 0964; No. 2013-CA-0964
Docket Number: No. 2013-CA-0964
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In