History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sano v. Sano
2011 Ohio 2110
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Married in June 1994; no children.
  • Patricia filed for divorce July 9, 2009; Joseph answered August 18, 2009.
  • Temporary orders required joint account deposits for household expenses.
  • Magistrate (May 27, 2010) recommended Patricia receive the marital residence (negative equity $262), 50/50 pension and accounts, and $7,472 financial misconduct finding leading to a $4,962 distributive payment plus spousal support.
  • Trial court overruled magistrate objections (August 9, 2010); final decree of divorce entered September 2, 2010; Joseph appeals on four assignments.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Contempt service sufficiency in show-cause motion Sano contends lack of personal service invalidates contempt Appellee had proper service on attorney; issues waived Assignments overruled; service issue waived
In personam jurisdiction over contempt motion Contempt motion not properly served on him Civ.R. 5 through attorney suffices; objections waived Assignments overruled; no reversible error
Financial misconduct findings supported; distributive award appropriate Evidence shows misappropriation totaling $7,472; entitlement to relief Arguments against misconduct lack clear proof; court erred No abuse of discretion; lump-sum distribution upheld
Spousal support amount/duration; no jurisdiction retained Court should retain jurisdiction or adjust based on earnings Court properly weighed factors; no retention necessary Not an abuse of discretion; support award affirmed; no jurisdiction retained

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Flinn, 7 Ohio App.3d 294 (Ohio 1982) (abuse of discretion standard in contempt review)
  • In re Purola, 73 Ohio App.3d 306 (Ohio 1991) (civil contempt; opportunity to purge; service rules discussed)
  • Koegel v. Koegel, 69 Ohio St.2d 355 (Ohio 1982) (wide latitude in division of marital property)
  • Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217 (Ohio 1983) (abuse of discretion standard in domestic relations rulings)
  • Tennant v. Martin-Auer, 188 Ohio App.3d 768 (2010) (factors for spousal-support determination; appellate review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sano v. Sano
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 2, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 2110
Docket Number: 2010 CA 00252
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.