History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rose v. Board of Trustees of the Mount Prospect Police Pension Fund
958 N.E.2d 315
Ill. App. Ct.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Rose, Mount Prospect patrol officer, injured in on-duty Feb 21, 2004 car accident during patrol.
  • He later suffered a separate off-duty car accident on June 1, 2004.
  • He sought a line-of-duty pension under 40 ILCS 5/3-114.1 and, alternatively, a nonduty pension under 40 ILCS 5/3-114.2; Board denied line-of-duty but granted nonduty.
  • Circuit court reversed the Board, awarding line-of-duty benefits; Board appealed.
  • Court holds petitioner entitled to a full line-of-duty pension; the on-duty Feb 2004 accident contributed to his disability; Board’s contrary finding was against the manifest weight of the evidence; standard of review discussed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Feb 21, 2004 injury was incurred in the performance of an act of duty Rose acted in patrol duties during investigation; capacity involved special risk Feb accident occurred while driving; not inherently a duty-related act of duty Yes; injury occurred in the performance of an act of duty
Whether the Feb 2004 accident contributed to Rose's disability Feb on-duty accident contributed to disability; multiple medical opinions support causation Disability due to June 2004 off-duty accident; Feb event not contributing The Feb 2004 accident at least in part contributed to disability (not solely the June accident)

Key Cases Cited

  • Johnson v. Retirement Board of the Policemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund, 114 Ill. 2d 518 (1986) (defines act of duty by capacity in which officer acts; includes generally protective duties)
  • Jones v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund, 384 Ill. App. 3d 1064 (2008) (patrol duties involve special risks; capacity focus, not act, governs entitlement)
  • Alm v. Lincolnshire Police Pension Board, 352 Ill. App. 3d 595 (2004) (bicycle patrol case; capacity-focused analysis supports line-of-duty benefits)
  • Merlo v. Orland Hills Police Pension Board, 383 Ill. App. 3d 97 (2008) (recognizes capacity-focused approach to act of duty within patrol context)
  • White v. City of Aurora, 323 Ill. App. 3d 733 (2001) (predecessor White ruling focusing on act; later cases favor capacity approach)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Rose v. Board of Trustees of the Mount Prospect Police Pension Fund
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Sep 15, 2011
Citation: 958 N.E.2d 315
Docket Number: 1-10-2157
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.