midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2012 Ohio 2129
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • David Rees and Maribel Aguilar Rees married on Nov. 22, 2002; they have one child born Feb. 2006.
  • A divorce action was filed Mar. 9, 2010, with a hearing in Oct. 2010 before a magistrate and a GAL.
  • Magistrate December 16, 2010 decision granted divorce for incompatibility, denied spousal support, awarded each party their own property, and designated David as the residential parent with visitation.
  • GAL recommended Maribel as residential parent if she remains in Ohio; expressed concerns about her intent to move to Texas with the child.
  • Trial court adopted the magistrate’s decision in June 2011; final judgment entered Sept. 2011, with no spousal support awarded to Maribel.
  • Mirabel appealed, challenging the trial court’s denial of spousal support; the court affirmed the judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Spousal-support award appropriate under RC 3105.18? Mirabel argued factors support spousal support due to marriage length and income disparity. Rees argued no evidence or need to award support; court did not abuse discretion. No abuse of discretion; spousal support denied.

Key Cases Cited

  • Tremaine v. Tremaine, 111 Ohio App.3d 703 (2d Dist.1996) (broad discretion in spousal-support awards; not reversed absent abuse of discretion)
  • Siekfer v. Siekfer, 2006-Ohio-5154 (3d Dist.) (factors for spousal support; burden on party seeking support)
  • Kunkle v. Kunkle, 51 Ohio St.3d 64 (1990) (14 factors guiding spousal-support analysis)
  • Strasburg v. Strasburg, 2010-Ohio-3672 (3d Dist.) (RC 3105.18(C)(1) factors guidance in support awards)
  • Rymers v. Rymers, 2010-Ohio-6439 (11th Dist.) (burden on party seeking spousal support; evidence needed)
  • Stetler v. Stetler, 6 Ohio App.3d 29 (3d Dist.1983) (burden to present evidence on factors; not every factor must be proven)
  • Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217 (1983) (abuse-of-discretion standard explained)
  • Bruce v. Bruce, 2012-Ohio-45 (3d Dist.) (abuse-of-discretion standard in domestic-relations awards)
  • Timberlake v. Timberlake, 2011-Ohio-38 (3d Dist.) (application of abuse-of-discretion standard in family-law decisions)
  • Berk v. Matthews, 53 Ohio St.3d 161 (1990) (economic considerations in dissolution)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Rees v. Rees
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 14, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 2129; 8-11-17
Docket Number: 8-11-17
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In