History
  • No items yet
midpage
276 P.3d 973
N.M. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Perez was arrested after a domestic disturbance; three Albuquerque officers restrained him inside his home.
  • Video captured only the latter portion of the arrest; the initial interaction occurred off-camera.
  • Post-arrest, Perez sought medical treatment two months later for neck/back pain, dizziness, and ankle bruising.
  • Perez alleged excessive force and assault/battery under the NM Tort Claims Act and Fourth Amendment claims; trial court denied summary judgment and directed verdict requests.
  • A jury verdict favored the Officers and City; Perez moved for JNOV and for a directed verdict, which were denied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the district court erred by submitting reasonable-force question to jury Perez argues no triable facts exist; reasonableness is a matter of law. City/OFFICERS contend jury should decide reasonableness given conflicting trial evidence and videotape. No error; jury disputed facts precluded directed verdict on reasonableness.
Whether the district court erred in denying JNOV Evidence conclusively shows excessive force after handcuffing; no disputed facts. Reasonableness depends on witness interpretations of videotape; there is substantial evidence to support verdict. No error; evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party supports the verdict.

Key Cases Cited

  • McNeill v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co., 143 N.M. 740 (2008-NMSC-022) (directed verdict standard; disfavored to interfere with jury)
  • Torres v. El Paso Electric Co., 127 N.M. 729 (1999-NMSC-029) (directed verdict standard; deference to jury function)
  • Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (U.S. Supreme Court 2007) (videotape not always controlling; summary judgment depends on record)
  • Melnick v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 106 N.M. 726 (1988) (directed verdict standard; strong showing required)
  • Page & Wirtz Constr. Co. v. Solomon, 110 N.M. 206 (1990) (substantial evidence standard for JNOV)
  • Littell v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2008-NMCA-012 (2008-NMCA-012) (sufficiency of evidence; standard of review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Perez v. City of Albuquerque
Court Name: New Mexico Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 5, 2012
Citations: 276 P.3d 973; 1 N.M. Ct. App. 562; 2012 WL 1548955; 2012 NMCA 040; 30,263
Docket Number: 30,263
Court Abbreviation: N.M. Ct. App.
Log In
    Perez v. City of Albuquerque, 276 P.3d 973