History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Sirypangno CA4/1
D078188
| Cal. Ct. App. | Oct 14, 2021
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2008 Sirypangno was convicted by jury of first-degree murder, attempted murder, and assault with a semiautomatic firearm; enhancements included gang allegations and a principal personally discharging a firearm.
  • A 2018 habeas grant (People v. Sirypangno) vacated the first-degree murder conviction and the judgment was modified to second-degree murder when the People declined retrial.
  • In April 2019 Sirypangno petitioned for resentencing under Penal Code §1170.95 (post–SB 1437), seeking relief as to his murder and attempted murder convictions.
  • The trial court denied the §1170.95 petition without issuing an order to show cause (OSC), stating from personal recollection that Sirypangno was a direct aider and abettor.
  • The People conceded the court erred by failing to issue an OSC as to the murder conviction; a related habeas opinion vacated the attempted-murder conviction, rendering that portion moot.
  • The Court of Appeal reversed and remanded: the trial court must issue an OSC for the murder petition and hold a §1170.95 hearing (the trial court may consider the record of conviction and new evidence at the hearing).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court properly denied a §1170.95 petition without issuing an order to show cause People argued §1170.95 relief was unavailable as a matter of law based on this court’s habeas decision (court implicitly found him a direct aider/abettor) Sirypangno argued he made a prima facie showing and the court was required to issue an OSC and appoint counsel before factfinding Trial court erred; record did not establish ineligibility as a matter of law. Reverse and remand for OSC and hearing.
Whether §1170.95 relief applies to the attempted-murder conviction in this case People argued petitioner ineligible for attempted-murder relief under §1170.95 (as originally enacted) Sirypangno argued the court erred in failing to issue OSC as to attempted murder Moot — attempted-murder conviction vacated in a related habeas proceeding; no live §1170.95 relief exists for that conviction here.

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Lewis, 11 Cal.5th 952 (2021) (clarifies §1170.95 prima facie inquiry and limits on pre-hearing factfinding)
  • People v. Chiu, 59 Cal.4th 155 (2014) (habeas relief principles applied in related proceedings)
  • In re Martinez, 3 Cal.5th 1216 (2017) (habeas standards relevant to post-conviction relief)
  • People v. Canizales, 7 Cal.5th 591 (2019) (discusses jury instruction and kill-zone theory issues cited in related habeas)
  • People v. Drayton, 47 Cal.App.5th 965 (2020) (explains limits on weighing evidence at the prima facie stage under §1170.95)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Sirypangno CA4/1
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Oct 14, 2021
Docket Number: D078188
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.