History
  • No items yet
midpage
378 P.3d 736
Ariz. Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Sandra Shaw, a 74‑year‑old vulnerable adult, was discharged from hospital to a ManorCare facility with multiple medical issues (UTI, chronic kidney disease, recent acute renal failure, meningioma, delirium, etc.).
  • During her stay Shaw became increasingly confused, refused medications/food, had a cloudy urine sample, was diagnosed with “early sepsis” by Dr. Cuzner, and received limited follow‑up care. She died shortly after transfer to long‑term care; death certificate listed sepsis with underlying conditions.
  • Marika Delgado (personal representative of Shaw’s estate) sued ManorCare and related defendants asserting medical malpractice, wrongful death, and an APSA claim for abuse/neglect (failure to seek/provide medical care).
  • ManorCare moved for summary judgment on the APSA claim arguing the alleged negligence involved treatment of an acute medical condition unrelated to Shaw’s incapacity; the trial court granted summary judgment.
  • On appeal the court assumed Shaw died of sepsis and considered whether ManorCare’s alleged failure to obtain/provide further medical care was sufficiently related to Shaw’s incapacity under the McGill factors to state an APSA claim.
  • The court reversed summary judgment, finding genuine factual disputes (expert affidavits and staff testimony) that ManorCare’s alleged failures could be related to Shaw’s incapacity and thus actionable under APSA.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether APSA covers alleged negligence that caused Shaw’s death Delgado: ManorCare failed to obtain/provide medical care for an incapacitated resident; but for incapacity Shaw could have sought care herself, so APSA applies ManorCare: The alleged negligence concerned an acute medical condition (sepsis) unrelated to Shaw’s incapacity and therefore falls outside APSA Reversed: Triable issues of fact exist whether failures to seek/provide care were related to problems causing incapacity; summary judgment improper
Whether claim preclusion bars Delgado’s APSA claim because malpractice/wrongful death claims were dismissed Delgado: APSA claim is distinct within the same action and not precluded ManorCare: Dismissal of related claims precludes negligence-based APSA claim Held: Claim preclusion inapplicable because the APSA claim was not a prior suit; all claims were in the same action
Whether expert affidavits supporting negligence were conclusory and insufficient to defeat summary judgment Delgado: Nursing and medical expert affidavits created triable issues on standard of care and relation to incapacity ManorCare: Expert affidavit (Dr. Williams) was conclusory and could be disregarded Held: Court did not find the affidavit rejected below; even if attacked, other evidence creates triable issues, so summary judgment improper
Whether APSA’s McGill factors were met (focus on factor 4: relation to problems causing incapacity) Delgado: Alleged failures to seek/provide care were linked to Shaw’s incapacity because she depended on caregivers to obtain treatment ManorCare: Sepsis and related treatment were acute and not tied to incapacity issues Held: Material factual disputes exist as to McGill factor 4; cannot rule as matter of law that negligence was unrelated to incapacity

Key Cases Cited

  • Estate of McGill ex rel. McGill v. Albrecht, 203 Ariz. 525 (Ariz. 2002) (articulates four McGill factors for when negligence can constitute APSA abuse/neglect)
  • Equihua v. Carondelet Health Network, 235 Ariz. 504 (App. 2014) (applied McGill to feeding‑tube negligence and held APSA could apply where service was the precise care undertaken because of incapacity)
  • In re Estate of Wyatt, 232 Ariz. 506 (App. 2014) (discusses nature of caregiver relationship and scope of care under APSA)
  • Florez v. Sargeant, 185 Ariz. 521 (1996) (court may disregard conclusory expert affidavits at summary judgment)
  • Law v. Verde Valley Medical Center, 217 Ariz. 92 (App. 2007) (principle on vicarious liability and preclusion in related contexts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Marika Delgado v. Manor Care of Tucson, Az, Llc,...william Amoureux
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Arizona
Date Published: Jun 28, 2016
Citations: 378 P.3d 736; 240 Ariz. 293; 2016 Ariz. App. LEXIS 161; 240 Ariz. 294; 742 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 10; 2 CA-CV 2015-0187
Docket Number: 2 CA-CV 2015-0187
Court Abbreviation: Ariz. Ct. App.
Log In
    Marika Delgado v. Manor Care of Tucson, Az, Llc,...william Amoureux, 378 P.3d 736