History
  • No items yet
midpage
Krause v. Thaler
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 6810
| 5th Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Krause was convicted on November 16, 2005, for possession of child pornography and conviction affirmed on direct appeal.
  • Discretionary review was denied by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on October 31, 2007; conviction became final after the 90-day period for certiorari.
  • Krause filed a state habeas corpus petition on February 25, 2009, which was denied on May 6, 2009.
  • Concurrently, Krause pursued a § 1983 action; that suit was filed April 15, 2005 and dismissed February 18, 2009.
  • Krause filed a federal habeas petition on May 21, 2009; TDCJ moved to dismiss as untimely under AEDPA.
  • District court ruled the one-year AEDPA clock began January 29, 2008 and expired around January 28, 2009; no adequate tolling held.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether transfer facility library tolling applies Krause's inadequate library tolled time under § 2244(d)(1)(B). No tolling because no state action prevented timely filing; facts insufficient. No tolling; insufficient facts show prevention of timely filing.
Whether Krause demonstrated actual impediment to filing Claimed limited access and transfer to better facility would have delayed filing. Record shows state action to assist; no facts of impediment established. Impediment not shown; library deficiencies do not constitute tolling.
Whether the AEDPA filing deadline was correctly enforced Deadline tolled by library issues and misperception of tolling. Deadline began Jan 29, 2008 and expired Jan 28, 2009; tolling not established. Deadline correctly enforced; no tolling justified.

Key Cases Cited

  • Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (U.S. 1996) (actual injury required to show lower court library prejudice)
  • Felder v. Johnson, 204 F.3d 168 (5th Cir. 2000) (no presumed tolling for absent materials; require impact on filing)
  • Egerton v. Cockrell, 334 F.3d 433 (5th Cir. 2003) (remanded to assess awareness and potential tolling; state action considerations)
  • Henderson v. Thaler, 626 F.3d 773 (5th Cir. 2010) (defines AEDPA deadline expiration date for finality)
  • Giesberg v. Cockrell, 288 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2002) (de novo review of time-barred habeas dismissal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Krause v. Thaler
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 4, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 6810
Docket Number: 10-20013
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.