History
  • No items yet
midpage
518 F. App'x 12
2d Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • KME sued Joan McDonald in her official DOT capacity, effectively against New York State.
  • District court dismissed the amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim.
  • KME argued two continuing federal-law violations: unlawful federal fund payments and future contracting practices.
  • Sovereign immunity generally bars federal suits against states; Ex parte Young provides a narrow prospective-relief exception.
  • KME asserted §1983 claims, but they were barred by the Eleventh Amendment and failed to allege personal involvement by McDonald.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sovereign immunity bar on official-capacity suit KME contends continuing violations allow prospective relief McDonald/State immunity bars the suit Barred; Eleventh Amendment applies
Standing to challenge federal funds and future bidding KME has concrete injury from funds to others No concrete, particularized injury; speculative future effects Lacks standing
Declaratory judgment on bid requirements Federal regs require lowest bid be accepted Judgment would be advisory Advisory opinion; not permissible
§1983 claim against McDonald in official capacity Seeking relief under §1983 Eleventh Amendment bars official-capacity §1983 claims Barred by Eleventh Amendment
Personal involvement for §1983 liability McDonald personally involved in deprivation No pleaded personal involvement Not stated; fails to state a claim

Key Cases Cited

  • Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159 (1985) (sovereign-immunity framework for official-capacity suits)
  • Green v. Mansour, 474 U.S. 64 (1985) (ex parte Young continuing-violation exception for prospective relief)
  • Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) (prospective injunctive relief against state officials permitted)
  • Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614 (1973) (standing requires concrete injury; cannot speculation)
  • Penguin Books USA Inc. v. Walsh, 929 F.2d 69 (1991) (declaratory relief must not be advisory)
  • Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free Sch. Dist., 365 F.3d 107 (2d Cir. 2004) (personal-involvement rule for §1983)
  • Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (1999) (sovereign-immunity limitations on federal suits)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: KM Enterprises, Inc. v. McDonald
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Apr 30, 2013
Citations: 518 F. App'x 12; 12-4314-cv
Docket Number: 12-4314-cv
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
Log In