History
  • No items yet
midpage
96 F.4th 956
6th Cir.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Kellie Farris called 911 alleging another woman (Franklin) damaged her car after a dispute, leading to deputies Mendicino and Winborn responding.
  • Deputies arrested Farris, after finding she possessed scissors and a knife, based on Franklin’s account that Farris threatened her with a weapon and tried to hit her with a car.
  • While being transported to jail, Farris engaged in suicidal behavior, leading to the use of additional precautions and force by deputies at the jail, including a cell extraction team.
  • In jail, deputies removed Farris from the vehicle, used a spit hood, deployed physical control techniques, and removed her clothing to place her on suicide watch.
  • Charges against Farris were dropped the next day; she subsequently miscarried. Farris brought federal and state claims for unlawful arrest, excessive force, and discrimination; the district court granted summary judgment for all defendants.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Probable cause for arrest Deputies lacked probable cause for arrest Deputies had reasonable grounds for felonious assault Probable cause existed
Excessive force at jail Deputies used unnecessary force (removal, spit hood, escorts, stripping) Force used was reasonable due to suicide risk and non-cooperation No clearly established violation
County liability (Monell) County failed to train officers (esp. on spit hoods) No pattern of violations; general training provided No deliberate indifference shown
State-law torts (e.g., false arrest, assault, IIED) Actions unjustified, causing personal harm Deputies immune and acted in good faith & authority Claims barred by immunity
Ethnic intimidation Deputies’ actions were racially/gender motivated No evidence of discriminatory intent No actionable animus found

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (probable cause allows warrantless felony arrest)
  • Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (objective reasonableness standard for excessive force under Fourth Amendment)
  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (probable cause standard is a “substantial chance” of criminal activity)
  • Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (no vicarious liability for municipalities under § 1983; must be a policy or custom)
  • Florence v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Cnty. of Burlington, 566 U.S. 318 (strip searches in detention justified by security and safety)
  • Criss v. City of Kent, 867 F.2d 259 (officers not required to credit suspect’s account over victim-witness at arrest stage)
  • Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (video evidence can override party’s contrary account at summary judgment)
  • Stoudemire v. Mich. Dep’t of Corrs., 705 F.3d 560 (force or searches applied to harass are unconstitutional, but must show intent)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kellie Farris v. Oakland County, Mich.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 22, 2024
Citations: 96 F.4th 956; 23-1739
Docket Number: 23-1739
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
Log In
    Kellie Farris v. Oakland County, Mich., 96 F.4th 956