Jarmin v. Office of Personnel Management
678 F. App'x 1023
Fed. Cir.2017Background
- Marvin L. Jarmin served on active duty (1954–1955), then in the Army Reserves (1955–1961), and worked as a civilian for USDA (1965–1986).
- His CSRS annuity included active-duty credit but not Reserve service credit.
- Jarmin requested OPM credit for Reserve service (Feb 2015); OPM denied the request and denied reconsideration (Nov 12, 2015).
- Jarmin appealed to the MSPB; the MSPB issued an initial decision and a Final Order affirming OPM on Aug 19, 2016, and included a notice that the Federal Circuit must receive any petition within 60 days.
- Jarmin’s first filing with the Federal Circuit was received Oct 20, 2016, two days after the 60-day statutory deadline (Oct 18, 2016).
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Federal Circuit has jurisdiction to review MSPB’s final order | Jarmin sought review of the MSPB/OPM denial of Reserve service credit | OPM/MSPB argued the petition was untimely and outside the 60-day statutory period | Court held it lacked jurisdiction because Jarmin filed after the 60-day deadline |
Key Cases Cited
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env't, 523 U.S. 83 (1998) (federal courts must confirm jurisdiction before addressing merits)
- Oja v. Dep't of the Army, 405 F.3d 1349 (2005) (timely filing under 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1) is prerequisite to circuit court jurisdiction)
- Monzo v. Dep't of Transp., 735 F.2d 1335 (1984) (the § 7703(b)(1) filing deadline is statutory, mandatory, and jurisdictional)
- Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 209 (2007) (statutory time limits to take an appeal are jurisdictional)
- Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick, 559 U.S. 154 (2010) (jurisdictional requirements and their consequences)
