Islamic Center of Nashville v. State of Tenn.
872 F.3d 377
| 6th Cir. | 2017Background
- Islamic Center of Nashville (ICN), a religious nonprofit, financed a school building (2008–2013) via an ijara financing arrangement in which a bank held legal title while ICN retained possession and use.
- County tax assessor returned the property to the tax roll during the period the bank held title; ICN regained title in October 2013 and then sought a retroactive tax exemption.
- State Board of Equalization’s designee restored the exemption prospectively but denied exemption for the period of bank ownership; ICN appealed administratively to an ALJ and then to the Assessment Appeals Commission, which denied retroactive relief.
- The Commission’s order noted judicial review is available in the chancery court; ICN did not seek chancery review and instead sued in federal district court asserting RFRA, RLUIPA, the First Amendment, and other claims.
- The State moved to dismiss under the Tax Injunction Act (TIA), 28 U.S.C. § 1341; the district court dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and ICN appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the TIA bars ICN’s federal suit challenging Tennessee tax law | ICN contends it seeks only prospective relief (declaratory/injunctive) and constitutional adjudication, not to avoid paid taxes; therefore TIA shouldn’t bar the suit | State argues TIA bars federal-court challenges to state tax assessments where a plain, speedy, efficient state remedy exists; ICN’s claims seek to invalidate assessments and are thus barred | TIA applies: ICN’s claims effectively seek relief against state tax assessments and are barred from federal court |
| Whether ICN’s First Amendment and federal statutory claims create an exception to the TIA | ICN relies on free‑speech/establishment claims and cases suggesting federal courts should hear constitutional claims | State counters Grace Brethren and related precedent reject a First Amendment exception to the TIA | No exception; First Amendment claims do not exempt ICN from the TIA |
| Whether Hibbs v. Winn permits ICN’s suit despite the TIA | ICN cites Hibbs as allowing some federal review of tax‑related constitutional claims | State distinguishes Hibbs: plaintiffs there did not seek relief to avoid their own tax liability but to prevent state tax benefits to others | Hibbs is inapplicable—ICN seeks to avoid its own tax liability, unlike Hibbs plaintiffs |
| Whether Tennessee provides a "plain, speedy and efficient remedy" under § 1341 | ICN argued appeal to chancery was elective/not mandatory; the Commission’s language ‘‘or other venue as provided by law’’ created uncertainty | State relies on Tennessee statutes directing judicial review in chancery court and precedent finding Tennessee procedures meet § 1341’s standard | Tennessee offers a plain, speedy, efficient remedy (chancery review); thus § 1341’s condition is satisfied |
| Whether district court abused discretion by dismissing without leave to amend | ICN claimed it should have leave to amend to cure pleading defects | State noted ICN never filed a motion or proposed amendment; futility since TIA bars federal jurisdiction | No abuse: ICN never sought leave and amendment would be futile given TIA bar |
Key Cases Cited
- California v. Grace Brethren Church, 457 U.S. 393 (1982) (TIA bars declaratory and injunctive relief challenging state tax administration; no First Amendment exception)
- Hibbs v. Winn, 542 U.S. 88 (2004) (limits of TIA when plaintiffs do not seek to avoid their own tax liability)
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Ass’n v. McNary, 454 U.S. 100 (1981) (comity and TIA protect state tax administration; limits on federal relief)
- Tafflin v. Levitt, 493 U.S. 455 (1990) (state courts presumptively competent to adjudicate federal claims)
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 474 F.3d 211 (6th Cir. 2007) (de novo review of § 1341 dismissal; discussion of state‑court adequacy)
- Levin v. Commerce Energy, Inc., 560 U.S. 413 (2010) (comity doctrine precluding federal suits that effectively seek to alter state tax burdens)
- Rosewell v. LaSalle Nat’l Bank, 450 U.S. 503 (1981) (comity and limits on federal jurisdiction over state taxation)
