History
  • No items yet
midpage
205 A.3d 1237
Pa. Super. Ct.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • On June 29, 2017, juvenile respondent N.A.D. and victim W.M. argued outside; N.A.D. had clenched fists and yelled about a perceived slight involving N.A.D.’s sister.
  • As the victim turned away, N.A.D. struck him one time in the left jaw, knocking him unconscious and causing profuse bleeding.
  • The victim was treated in the trauma unit, underwent surgery, and had his jaw wired shut for over six weeks; serious bodily injury was undisputed.
  • Trooper Kastner and the victim testified consistently that the victim was punched; hospital records reflected the victim later learned he had been punched.
  • The trial court found the victim credible and adjudicated N.A.D. delinquent for aggravated assault, simple assault, and harassment; juvenile appealed contesting sufficiency as to aggravated assault.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether evidence sufficed for aggravated assault under 18 Pa.C.S. §2702(a)(1) Commonwealth: single punch that produced serious bodily injury can establish aggravated assault when intent may be inferred from circumstances N.A.D.: single punch, immediate apology, crying, no size disparity, and driving victim home show lack of extreme indifference or intent Affirmed: one punch causing serious bodily injury, combined with sneak attack, clenched fists, and force, supports reckless conduct manifesting extreme indifference

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Burton, 2 A.3d 598 (Pa. Super. 2010) (single punch producing severe injury can support aggravated assault)
  • Commonwealth v. Patrick, 933 A.2d 1043 (Pa. Super. 2007) (surprise single blow causing unconsciousness supports reckless indifference)
  • In Interest of P.S., 158 A.3d 643 (Pa. Super. 2017) (Commonwealth must prove elements beyond a reasonable doubt in juvenile delinquency)
  • In Interest of C.E.H., 167 A.3d 767 (Pa. Super. 2017) (intent to cause serious bodily injury may be proven circumstantially)
  • In re T.D., Jr., 57 A.3d 650 (Pa. Super. 2012) (plenary review scope for sufficiency challenges)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In the Interest of: N.A.D., Appeal of: N.A.D.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 5, 2019
Citations: 205 A.3d 1237; 637 MDA 2018
Docket Number: 637 MDA 2018
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
Log In
    In the Interest of: N.A.D., Appeal of: N.A.D., 205 A.3d 1237