History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Caterbone
640 F.3d 108
| 3rd Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Caterbone filed a Chapter 11 petition in May 2005 and faced dismissal for cause in October 2006.
  • The Bankruptcy Court dismissed the petition on October 3, 2006, and mailed the order on October 5, 2006.
  • Caterbone mailed a notice of appeal on October 16, 2006; the notice was filed with the district court on October 19, 2006, outside the applicable 10-day window.
  • No extension request was filed before expiration, nor did the court grant an extension for excusable neglect following a later motion.
  • The district court docketed Caterbone’s appeal on November 14, 2006, and later sua sponte dismissed it on March 15, 2007 for failure to designate record items and issues on appeal.
  • The trustee moved to dismiss the appeal based on untimeliness, arguing lack of subject matter jurisdiction, which the Third Circuit later addressed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether untimely notice of appeal deprives appellate jurisdiction Caterbone argues excusable neglect saves the filing lateness under Rule 8002(c). The Trustee and the court argued § 158(c)(2) jurisdiction is triggered by timely filing and untimeliness defeats jurisdiction. Untimely filing is jurisdictional; dismissal affirmed and remanded for lack of jurisdiction.

Key Cases Cited

  • Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (Supreme Court 2007) (timely filing of a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement)
  • Kontrick v. Ryan, 540 U.S. 443 (Supreme Court 2004) (bankruptcy-rule time limits are sometimes non-jurisdictional acting as claim-processing rules)
  • Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick, 130 S. Ct. 1237 (Supreme Court 2010) (context determines whether a limitation is jurisdictional despite nonlabeling)
  • Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500 (Supreme Court 2006) (text or context of a jurisdictional provision governs classification of limitations)
  • Shareholders v. Sound Radio, Inc., 109 F.3d 873 (3d Cir. 1997) (Rule 8002 time limit previously treated as jurisdictional in Third Circuit)
  • In re Universal Minerals, Inc., 755 F.2d 309 (3d Cir. 1985) (precedent treating bankruptcy appeal deadlines as jurisdictional)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Caterbone
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: Apr 4, 2011
Citation: 640 F.3d 108
Docket Number: 07-2151
Court Abbreviation: 3rd Cir.