History
  • No items yet
midpage
794 N.W.2d 800
Wis. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Jennifer B.'s parental rights were terminated under Wis. Stat. § 48.415(1)(a)2 (three-month abandonment) based on a CHIPS order placing Cordell outside Jennifer's home.
  • The CHIPS order placed Cordell in the Dane County home of his father and stepmother and included notice of possible termination grounds.
  • A separate custody/placement dispute in January 2009 directed that the father have primary placement, with Cordell already placed with the father under CHIPS.
  • The CHIPS order was terminated in March 2009, before the three-month abandonment period concluded.
  • The asserted three-month abandonment period ran from February 21, 2009, to June 2009, ending after the CHIPS placement ended by about ten weeks; trial court found abandonment proven and Jennifer appeals.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether three-month abandonment must fall within CHIPS placement duration Jennifer contends the three-month period must fully fall within the CHIPS-based placement. Heather contends notice in the CHIPS order suffices regardless of CHIPS duration. Yes; the three-month period must fall within CHIPS placement duration.

Key Cases Cited

  • Rhonda R.D. v. Franklin R.D., 191 Wis. 2d 680 (Ct. App. 1995) (applies six-month abandonment to CHIPS-like contexts)
  • K.K. v. Rock County DSS, 162 Wis. 2d 431 (Ct. App. 1991) (addressed CHIPS notice when subsequent CHIPS orders varied)
  • Donaldson v. Town of Spring Valley, 311 Wis. 2d 223 (Wis. App. 2008) (statutory interpretation framework for Wisconsin statutes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Heather B. v. Jennifer B.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Date Published: Jan 20, 2011
Citations: 794 N.W.2d 800; 2011 WI App 26; 331 Wis. 2d 666; 2011 Wisc. App. LEXIS 47; No. 2010AP2528
Docket Number: No. 2010AP2528
Court Abbreviation: Wis. Ct. App.
Log In
    Heather B. v. Jennifer B., 794 N.W.2d 800