History
  • No items yet
midpage
Com. v. Robinson, A.
Com. v. Robinson, A. No. 1937 EDA 2016
| Pa. Super. Ct. | May 16, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Andre Robinson pled guilty on January 18, 1989 to first‑degree murder and robbery and was sentenced the same day to life without parole.
  • He did not file a direct appeal; his judgment of sentence became final on February 17, 1989 (expiration of time to seek direct review).
  • Robinson filed a first PCRA petition in 2002, which was unsuccessful.
  • On September 11, 2015, he filed a second pro se PCRA petition invoking Alleyne and other decisions to challenge his sentence.
  • The PCRA court issued Rule 907 notice and dismissed the petition as untimely on May 13, 2016; Robinson appealed pro se.
  • The Superior Court affirmed, holding the petition was time‑barred and no timeliness exception applied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Robinson's 2015 PCRA petition is timely Alleyne and related decisions supply a basis to challenge his sentence despite the long delay The petition was filed over 26 years after finality and is untimely under the PCRA Petition is untimely; court lacks jurisdiction
Whether Alleyne qualifies as a "new fact" under §9545(b)(1)(ii) Alleyne creates factual/legal basis that was previously unknown Decisional law is not a "new fact" for the PCRA exception Alleyne is not a "new fact"; exception inapplicable
Whether Alleyne or its progeny announce a new constitutional right that applies retroactively on collateral review under §9545(b)(1)(iii) Alleyne announces a new rule that should apply retroactively to invalidate the sentence Neither the U.S. Supreme Court nor the Pa. Supreme Court has held Alleyne retroactive on collateral review Alleyne has not been held retroactive; exception fails
Whether Miller v. Alabama (juvenile sentencing) helps Robinson Miller renders mandatory LWOP unconstitutional and could relieve him Robinson was 22 at the time of the offense; Miller applies only to juveniles Miller inapplicable to Robinson; does not save the petition

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Hackett, 956 A.2d 978 (Pa. 2008) (PCRA timeliness is jurisdictional)
  • Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013) (increased mandatory minimums must be found by jury)
  • Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) (mandatory LWOP for juveniles unconstitutional)
  • Commonwealth v. Miller, 102 A.3d 988 (Pa. Super. 2014) (Alleyne not held retroactive on collateral review)
  • Commonwealth v. Brandon, 51 A.3d 231 (Pa. Super. 2012) (decisional law is not a "new fact" under §9545(b)(1)(ii))
  • Commonwealth v. Chambers, 35 A.3d 34 (Pa. Super. 2011) (requirements for newly created constitutional right exception)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Com. v. Robinson, A.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 16, 2017
Docket Number: Com. v. Robinson, A. No. 1937 EDA 2016
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.