History
  • No items yet
midpage
Coley v. City of Hartford
2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 29
Conn. App. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff, administrator of Loma Coley’s estate, sues Hartford for negligence related to police response to a family violence incident.
  • Nov. 5, 2007, 8:39 p.m.: Officers responded to 47 Bolton Street where Williams reported Chapdelaine threatened her with a firearm.
  • Coley, Williams’s relative, witnessed the events; officers later arrested Chapdelaine attempt after leaving to obtain an arrest warrant.
  • Protective order prohibited Chapdelaine from contacting Williams; officers had previously responded to domestic violence at 47 Bolton Street.
  • Approximately three hours after the initial call, officers returned to 47 Bolton Street, rescued screams were heard, and Coley was killed.
  • Plaintiff filed suit Nov. 17, 2009, alleging negligence in (a) arrest failure, (b) inadequate time at scene, and (c) failure to follow police response procedures.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether officers’ duties were ministerial or discretionary Coley contends §46b-38b(d) and procedures imposed a ministerial duty to stay at scene. City argues discretionary immunity applies; no ministerial duty to Coley. Officers’ duties were discretionary; no ministerial duty to Coley.
Whether police response procedures created a duty to Coley Procedures purportedly impose ministerial duty to remain at scene for safety. Procedures create duties to victims, not Coley; no enforceable duty to plaintiff. No duty to Coley under procedures; immunity applies.

Key Cases Cited

  • Violano v. Fernandez, 280 Conn. 310 (Conn. 2006) (discretionary vs. ministerial framework; public vs. private duty distinction)
  • Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing Authority, 208 Conn. 161 (Conn. 1988) (discretionary vs. ministerial nature of municipal acts)
  • Kolaniak v. Board of Education, 28 Conn. App. 277 (Conn. App. 1992) (distinguishes ministerial acts and discretionary acts; standard for immunity)
  • Ward v. Greene, 267 Conn. 539 (Conn. 2004) (duty to protected class under statutory directive; individual vs. public duty)
  • Doe v. Petersen, 279 Conn. 607 (Conn. 2006) (statutory framework for municipal liability; public duty doctrine)
  • State v. Fernando A., 294 Conn. 1 (Conn. 2009) (P.A. 86-337 family violence reforms; victim safety duties)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Coley v. City of Hartford
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Jan 22, 2013
Citation: 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 29
Docket Number: AC 33904
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.