History
  • No items yet
midpage
372 P.3d 195
Wyo.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Late evening stop after vehicle exited bar parking lot; officer observed no license plates, only a white paper in the upper-left of a heavily tinted rear window.
  • Officer could not confirm whether the paper was a notarized bill of sale/title required for temporary operation; approached and asked the driver (Clay) about paperwork.
  • During the initial contact officer detected odor of alcohol, an empty vodka bottle in the car, slow motor skills, and evasive eye contact.
  • A DUI Task Force officer arrived, smelled heavy alcohol, observed slurred speech and glazed eyes, administered three field sobriety tests; Clay performed poorly and was arrested.
  • Blood test showed BAC 0.18%; Clay pleaded guilty conditionally to fourth-offense DUI, preserving appeal of suppression denial.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether contact after the stop expanded detention beyond scope Clay: officer unnecessarily made contact after noticing paper; any evidence of intoxication flowed from unlawful expansion and should be suppressed State: officer needed to question driver to determine whether the paper satisfied temporary registration rules, so contact was within stop scope Officer had reasonable suspicion to stop; questioning about the paper was within scope; subsequent observations gave reasonable suspicion of DUI, so evidence admissible

Key Cases Cited

  • Allgier v. State, 358 P.3d 1271 (Wyo. 2015) (reasonable-suspicion standard for traffic stops and allowance for some officer mistakes)
  • Dimino v. State, 286 P.3d 789 (Wyo. 2012) (distinguishing consensual encounters, investigatory detention, and arrest; limits on expanding traffic stops)
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (establishing investigatory stop framework)
  • Heien v. North Carolina, 135 S. Ct. 530 (2014) (reasonable-suspicion tolerates reasonable mistakes of law)
  • Engdahl v. State, 327 P.3d 114 (Wyo. 2014) (approach to vehicle occupants related to stop’s purpose)
  • Venegas v. State, 287 P.3d 746 (Wyo. 2012) (totality-of-circumstances test for reasonable suspicion)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Clay v. State
Court Name: Wyoming Supreme Court
Date Published: May 27, 2016
Citations: 372 P.3d 195; 2016 WY 55; 2016 Wyo. LEXIS 59; 2016 WL 3063806; S-15-0240
Docket Number: S-15-0240
Court Abbreviation: Wyo.
Log In
    Clay v. State, 372 P.3d 195