History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baze v. Parker
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2172
6th Cir.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Baze, a Kentucky inmate on death row, seeks interviews to bolster his clemency bid.
  • KDOC denied unfettered access to prison personnel and inmates in January 2009.
  • Baze sued in state court; Kentucky courts rejected his claim, and the Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed.
  • In February 2010, Baze sought a federal order under 18 U.S.C. § 3599(f) or the All Writs Act to obtain interviews.
  • The district court denied relief for lack of jurisdiction; the Sixth Circuit reviews jurisdiction de novo.
  • The court considers whether § 3599 or the All Writs Act authorizes such an enforcement order.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether § 3599 authorizes enforcement orders beyond funding Baze contends § 3599(f) empowers courts to order access to information Parker argues § 3599(f) limits to funding for reasonably necessary services, not enforcement No jurisdiction; § 3599(f) only funds services, not compel state officials
Whether the All Writs Act provides independent jurisdiction Baze relies on All Writs Act to enforce access to interviewees Parker argues All Writs Act requires aid to existing jurisdiction and cannot create new authority here No jurisdiction; All Writs Act relief is not in aid of § 3599 jurisdiction

Key Cases Cited

  • Harbison v. Bell, 129 S. Ct. 1481 (U.S. 2009) (§ 3599 authorizes indigent clemency counsel)
  • Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Cir. 2001) (pardon/commutation decisions rarely subject to judicial review)
  • Ohio Adult Parole Auth. v. Woodard, 523 U.S. 272 (U.S. 1998) (federalism concerns in state proceedings)
  • Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 (U.S. 1991) (federal habeas corpus federalism and finality principles)
  • Young (Younger) v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (U.S. 1971) (federal courts abstain from interfering with ongoing state proceedings)
  • United States v. Perry, 360 F.3d 519 (6th Cir. 2004) (All Writs Act scope in aiding jurisdiction)
  • Bob Jones Univ. v. United States, 461 U.S. 574 (U.S. 1983) (statutory interpretation and contextual reading of statutes)
  • Finley v. United States, 490 U.S. 545 (U.S. 1989) (court jurisdiction limited to Congress-granted powers)
  • Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cnty. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs, 531 U.S. 159 (U.S. 2001) (statutory interpretation to avoid federalism problems)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Baze v. Parker
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 4, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2172
Docket Number: 10-5584
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.