History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barron v. State
2015 Ga. LEXIS 660
Ga.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Barron convicted of felony murder during aggravated assault in the stabbing of fellow inmate Rumph.
  • Evidence shows Barron planned the confrontation after learning Rumph would not provide cigarettes, obtaining a shank, and seeking Rumph in a sally port.
  • Barron stabbed Rumph three times while Rumph faced away; Barron remained at the scene afterward and Rumph died.
  • Trial court declined to instruct on voluntary manslaughter; Barron objected only in later proceedings; issues centered on provocation and instruction.
  • Barron challenged procedural adequacy of appellate review under OCGA § 17-8-58 and standard for when a jury instruction is required; the court addresses sufficiency and provocation claims on the merits.
  • Barron’s second trial convicted him of felony murder; his first trial resulted in acquittal on malice murder and a mistrial on felony murder, with sentencing to follow for the murder conviction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is there sufficient evidence for felony murder given underlying aggravated assault? Barron Barron Yes; evidence supports conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
Was the voluntary manslaughter instruction required given provocation evidence? Barron relied on evidence of provocation due to Rumph’s conduct. State argued no provocation enough to excite passion. No; no provocation sufficient to warrant lesser-included instruction.

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. 1979) (sufficiency review for criminal convictions)
  • McLean v. State, 291 Ga. 873 (Ga. 2012) (instructions must be legal, apt, and supported by evidence)
  • Campbell v. State, 292 Ga. 766 (Ga. 2013) (provocation must excite passions in a reasonable person)
  • Tepanca v. State, 297 Ga. 47 (Ga. 2015) (gestures alone not provocation; no uplift to voluntary manslaughter)
  • Taylor v. State, 282 Ga. 502 (Ga. 2007) (distinguishes rational vs. impulsive actions in provocation analysis)
  • Guthridge v. State, 297 Ga. 126 (Ga. 2015) (plain error review when failure to object is alleged)
  • Alvelo v. State, 290 Ga. 609 (Ga. 2012) (plain error standard—affects fairness or integrity)
  • Johnson v. State, 295 Ga. 615 (Ga. 2014) (plain error review thresholds and waivers)
  • Taylor v. State, 282 Ga. 502 (Ga. 2007) (reiterates evaluation of provocation evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Barron v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 14, 2015
Citation: 2015 Ga. LEXIS 660
Docket Number: S15A1321
Court Abbreviation: Ga.