History
  • No items yet
midpage
4:24-cv-00205
E.D. Tex.
Jun 16, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Altagrace Exume was injured when a spare tire fell off a tractor-trailer ahead of her on the highway on October 26, 2022.
  • The truck belonged to Alain Sanchez, was driven by Alexys Figueredo, and displayed United Cargo Logistics, LLC’s (UCL) USDOT number.
  • Exume alleged negligence, negligent entrustment, and vicarious liability (including statutory employer and respondeat superior theories) against UCL, also alleging gross negligence and claims related to hiring, retention, supervision, and training.
  • Exume filed suit, UCL removed the case to federal court, and UCL then moved for summary judgment on all claims.
  • The core disputes centered on whether UCL controlled the truck or driver, and thus could be vicariously or directly liable, and whether sufficient evidence supported each claim.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Negligence UCL owed duty or was itself negligent No evidence of UCL's duty, ownership, or direct action Summary judgment granted: No evidence UCL was negligent
Negligent Hiring, Retention, etc. UCL employed/supervised Figueredo Figueredo not UCL employee; no evidence of relationship Summary judgment granted: No evidence of employment
Statutory Employer Liability UCL’s USDOT number = statutory employer status No lease/agreement for trip; no control over driver Summary judgment denied: Genuine fact issue on statutory employer
Respondeat Superior UCL liable for Figueredo’s negligence as employer Figueredo not UCL employee Summary judgment granted: No evidence of employer status
Negligent Entrustment UCL (as owner/control) should not have entrusted truck Did not own, control, or entrust: no knowledge of risk Summary judgment denied: Genuine issue re: control/knowledge
Gross Negligence UCL’s conduct was grossly negligent No supporting evidence Summary judgment granted: No evidence supporting elements

Key Cases Cited

  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (summary judgment standard; burden on movant and nonmovant)
  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (genuine dispute of material fact standard)
  • Nabors Drilling, U.S.A. v. Escoto, 288 S.W.3d 401 (elements of negligence under Texas law)
  • Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Mayes, 236 S.W.3d 754 (requirements for respondeat superior under Texas law)
  • Schneider v. Esperanza Transmission Co., 744 S.W.2d 595 (elements for negligent entrustment)
  • Lee Lewis Const., Inc. v. Harrison, 70 S.W.3d 778 (gross negligence, objective and subjective components)
  • Reeder v. Wood Cnty. Energy, LLC, 395 S.W.3d 789 (gross negligence standards)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Altagrace Exume v. United Cargo Logistics, LLC
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Texas
Date Published: Jun 16, 2025
Citation: 4:24-cv-00205
Docket Number: 4:24-cv-00205
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Tex.
Log In
    Altagrace Exume v. United Cargo Logistics, LLC, 4:24-cv-00205