History
  • No items yet
midpage
10-48 341
10-48 341
| Board of Vet. App. | Sep 27, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served on active duty July 1988–July 1991 and appealed RO rating decisions to the Board of Veterans' Appeals.
  • Claims on appeal: service connection for an esophageal tear; increased rating for migraine headaches (current 30% under DC 8100); entitlement to TDIU.
  • VA previously remanded esophageal-tear claim (Feb 2014); RO later granted service connection for an unspecified depressive disorder (Sept 2016), removing that issue from appeal.
  • Medical evidence includes VA DBQs (Sept 2014, Nov 2016), treatment notes, and a Sept 2016 private vocational opinion; combined schedular rating totaled 90% (including 70% for depressive disorder and 30% for migraines).
  • Board credited VA examiners for migraine frequency/impact and the private vocational expert for functional limitations; found migraines averaged about once monthly and were not "very frequent" or productively disabling to the degree required for a 50% rating.
  • Board found, resolving reasonable doubt in veteran’s favor, that service-connected disabilities in combination rendered him unable to secure and follow substantially gainful employment (granted TDIU). Esophageal-tear claim remanded for additional testing (current EGD) per prior remand directives.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Entitlement to service connection for an esophageal tear Veteran asserts ongoing reflux, nausea, vomiting, occasional hematemesis consistent with prior in-service tear RO/VA relied on prior normal EGD (Jan 2013) and DBQ; contended no current evidence of tear REMANDED for adequate VA exam and current testing (including EGD) per prior remand directions
Increased rating >30% for migraine headaches (DC 8100) Migraines cause chronic daily symptoms, weekly prostrating headaches, photophobia/phonophobia, vomiting — argue for higher rating up to 50% VA points to exam findings showing prostrating attacks about once a month, not ‘‘very frequent’’ or productive of severe economic inadaptability DENIED: evidence shows attacks average once monthly; criteria for 50% not met
Entitlement to TDIU due to service‑connected disabilities Veteran (and private vocational expert) argues combined service‑connected disabilities (notably 70% depression + others) prevent securing/following substantially gainful employment VA earlier examiner (2013) suggested sedentary work possible, but that predated grant of 70% depressive disorder; RO relied on medical record and vocational analysis GRANTED: resolving doubt for Veteran, combined service‑connected disabilities render him unable to secure/follow substantially gainful employment

Key Cases Cited

  • Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (grant of benefits by RO removes that issue from appellate status)
  • Scott v. McDonald, 789 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (Board need not raise procedural arguments not asserted by appellant)
  • Nieves‑Rodriguez v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 295 (2008) (weight to examiner opinions tied to adequate rationale and supporting data)
  • Pierce v. Principi, 18 Vet. App. 440 (2004) (economic inadaptability language in DC 8100 does not require total inability to work)
  • Fenderson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 119 (1999) (requirement to consider staged ratings)
  • Hart v. Mansfield, 21 Vet. App. 505 (2007) (discussion of staged rating methodology)
  • Roberson v. Principi, 251 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (Veteran need not show 100% unemployability to obtain TDIU)
  • Stegall v. West, 11 Vet. App. 268 (1998) (requirement for substantial compliance with Board remand directives)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 10-48 341
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Sep 27, 2017
Docket Number: 10-48 341
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.