History
  • No items yet
midpage
10-12 603
10-12 603
| Board of Vet. App. | Oct 31, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served active duty Jan 2002–Apr 2003 and May 2014–Aug 2015; claim for service connection for a right knee disability (including secondary to left knee or other service-connected conditions) appealed to the Board.
  • Initial RO denial (Dec 2008); claim reopened and remanded by the Board in Sept 2016 for additional development including a secondary causation opinion; VA examinations were performed in 2008, 2016, and 2017.
  • Medical record: no right-knee complaints or documented right-knee condition during the first service period; VA notes an “asymptomatic right knee” in 2005; right knee pain appears in records around 2007–2008 with left knee issues more prominent; right knee arthroscopy occurred circa 2010.
  • VA medical opinions (2008 and 2016–2017) concluded the right knee meniscal tear/arthralgia was not caused or aggravated by service or by the service-connected left knee or other service-connected conditions (no abnormal gait or overuse documented).
  • No contemporaneous documentation of right knee problem during the second service period (2014–2015); no competent lay or medical evidence showing in-service incurrence or aggravation during that period.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Direct service connection for right knee Right knee disability was incurred in or linked to service (or manifested within one year) Record shows no in-service right-knee injury or symptoms; first documentation years after service Denied — no in-service incurrence or continuity of symptomatology shown
Secondary service connection (to left knee) Right knee worsened/occurred due to overuse/weight shift from service-connected left knee Medical opinions: different anatomy/pathophysiology, no abnormal gait, typical meniscal tear mechanism not overuse Denied — medical evidence rejects causal link to left knee
Secondary connection to other service‑connected conditions Right knee caused or aggravated by other service‑connected disabilities Medical opinions found unrelated pathophysiology and no evidence of aggravation Denied — insufficient medical nexus or aggravation evidence
Aggravation during second service period (2014–2015) of preexisting right-knee condition May have been aggravated during 2014–2015 active duty No documentation or competent history of right-knee problems during that period; presumption of soundness not rebutted by evidence of aggravation Denied — no evidence of aggravation in the 2014–2015 service period

Key Cases Cited

  • Scott v. McDonald, 789 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir.) (Board need not raise procedural arguments not asserted by veteran)
  • Dickens v. McDonald, 814 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir.) (applies Scott to duty-to-assist issues)
  • Davidson v. Shinseki, 581 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir.) (elements required to establish service connection)
  • Walker v. Shinseki, 708 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir.) (limits continuity-of-symptomatology principle)
  • Baldwin v. West, 13 Vet.App. 1 (Vet. App.) (weighing probative value of medical and lay evidence)
  • Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.App. 303 (Vet. App.) (continuity of symptomatology can substantiate in-service incurrence)
  • Kahana v. Shinseki, 24 Vet.App. 428 (Vet. App.) (scope of veteran’s competence to offer lay etiology opinions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 10-12 603
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Oct 31, 2017
Docket Number: 10-12 603
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.